Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 March 26

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< March 25 << Feb | March | Apr >> March 27 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


March 26

[edit]

00:10:34, 26 March 2022 review of submission by Marjoram48

[edit]

What Wikiproject classification tags should I put in? Marjoram48 (talk) 00:10, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marjoram48. You are not required to add any WikiProject tags to a draft. If User:Marjoram48/sandbox will be a biography of a historical figure, a woman in Australia, then WikiProjects Biography, Women's History, and Australia might be appropriate. There's little point in adding WikiProjects, however, until you've made a solid start on the draft. You may find Help:Your first article useful. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:34, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

05:11:04, 26 March 2022 review of submission by Phoebae

[edit]


Hello there, I'm a newbie here. So, could someone review my draft and point out mistakes?

Phoebae (talk) 05:11, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Phoebae: The lists in the article need to be removed, especially the investors list. Refer to the top table here:
As this article potentially falls into a topic area under sanctions, this is all I will say on this matter, beyond dropping a sanctions alert on your talkpage. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 07:14, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

05:16:23, 26 March 2022 review of submission by 張民耀

[edit]


張民耀 (talk) 05:16, 26 March 2022 (UTC)I mean, some people love Roblox games and they want information about the game. Why not post some information about the games in Wikipedia?[reply]

@張民耀: No sources, no article, no debate. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 06:59, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok… 張民耀 (talk) 08:47, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If there are zero reliable sources online about the game, I doubt many people actually do want information about the game. Bsoyka (talk) 17:57, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessarily harsh reactions, including the phrases "zero reliable sources online", and particularly "no debate". I agree that there's insufficient notability, but in the Roblox metaverse this is a big deal. With a little bit of effort, you reactors could have found Roblox#Games, and from there List of Roblox games#Piggy, and then suggested to the editor to improve the latter section instead. At the Bloxy Awards, it has been nominated for both "Game of the Year" and "Best New Game" (source at Billboard), in the context of the metaverse has been on many best game lists (e.g. [1] at VG247, [2] at Screen Rant, [3] at Rock Paper Shotgun), been described as "one of the best scary horror games" (source at Radio Times). It is extremely popular: "one of the most popular games" ([4] at New York Post), one of the "popular games" ([5] at The Daily Telegraph), "now has over 5 billion plays" ([6] at TechCrunch), "played more than 6.5 billion times" ([7] at The Irish Times). --77.162.8.57 (talk) 15:03, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

12:39:04, 26 March 2022 review of submission by Reayl name

[edit]


Reayl name (talk) 12:39, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You don't ask a question, but two words that have no sources will never be accepted as a Wikipedia article. Please read more about what Wikipedia is, as well as Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 13:40, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This would be a slam-dunk no-content or no-context speedy deletion if it were in article space. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:24, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

19:08:25, 26 March 2022 review of draft by Shayaccount

[edit]


Shayaccount (talk) 19:08, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can online store selling a book related to the article be accepted as reference links? I am writing about a author of a book.


Also! How do I insert picture (s) of the author, in visual editing mode?

In order:
  • No. Online storefronts are only useful insofar as they provide a release date; the publisher is going to be a far more reliable source for this nine times out of ten.
  • Images don't help a draft what-so-ever, and we would need a freely-licensed image, not one you pulled off of Google Image Search.
—Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:23, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Shayaccount: As to your actual sources, refer to User:Jéské Couriano/Decode:
Absolutely none of the sources you cite are usable. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 19:35, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How do I insert an author's photo for a biography? YouTube videos show a simple search made in Template. However all videos predate an obvious setup change. There is no search bar in template, only already used private templates. Please help!

As I said above, images do not help a draft what-so-ever, and we don't accept fair-use images of living people. Please reply in this existing section instead of making a new one. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 20:42, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

21:07:52, 26 March 2022 review of submission by TomahF

[edit]


I have spent a considerable amount of time preparing this timeline and believe it will be of interest to mechanical engineers. Drafts have been reviewed several times and I have addressed the various issues. The current version is much improved as a result.

The latest response that "This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia," does not seem valid. Wikipedia currently costs numerous timelines, some of which are quite similar to the one I am proposing. For example, see the numerous examples available at List_of_timelines (List of timelines).

I serve on the history and heritage committee of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and I know that committee is very interested in seeing this effort go forward. We wish to use the Wikipedia space to allow others to add to the listing, as well as for the listing to be available for research and other uses.

Please let me know how we can move this effort forward.

Sincerely, TomahF (talk) 21:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)Tom Fehring, P.E. Member, ASME History and Heritage Committee[reply]


TomahF (talk) 21:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TomahF Rejection means that resubmission is not possible, at least in the short term. I apologize greatly for being frank, but Wikipedia has no interest in the goals of other organizations like your society(please review conflict of interest) with regards to Wikipedia content. Much of the draft appears to be a copyright violation, which is an instant fail. Something being an "innovation" is an opinion and not an appropriate title for an encyclopedia article which should have a neutral point of view. Who views it as innovative?(rhetorical question) We're interested in what independent reliable sources say, not just the opinion of one organization. Please see other stuff exists; other poor articles existing does not mean that more can be added. We just haven't gotten around to addressing them yet. 331dot (talk) 22:14, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
First: I do not believe any of the items in the draft represent a copyright violation. Of the over 1,000 items cited in the timeline, an earlier draft had included two or three items that used language directly from other sources. I found those errors and cleaned them up.
Second: There are numerous references that reveal that these items reflect true innovation, if you will look through the draft--all from independent reliable sources.
Third: This effort in no way reflects a conflict of interest. It is not meant to reflect only the interest of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Rather it is directed at anyone interested in the history of technology. TomahF (talk) 20:46, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2022_March_26&oldid=1080402617"