Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 September 12
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < September 11 | << Aug | September | Oct >> | September 13 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
September 12
[edit]05:28:23, 12 September 2021 review of submission by 45.115.91.147
[edit]
45.115.91.147 (talk) 05:28, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- You don't ask a question, but the draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not a place to tell the world about yourself or post your resume, please see the autobiography policy. If you want to tell the world about yourself, you should use social media. 331dot (talk) 12:50, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
20:07:51, 12 September 2021 review of submission by Wikisteveb4
[edit]- Wikisteveb4 (talk · contribs)
Wikisteveb4 (talk) 20:07, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Please re-review this draft. Once it is published, people will see it as an article and more people will edit it, making it better. There are many other articles on Wikipedia like this or much worse that have been approved. Thank you.
- Wikisteveb4 The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. That other, worse articles exist does not mean that they have been approved by anyone, as using the AFC process is not required(but risky for those inexperienced). As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inappropriate articles to get by us. That they exist does not mean that yours can too. We can only address what we know about. If you want to help us work on the six million plus articles we have, you are welcome to identify these other inappropriate articles you have seen for possible action.
- No amount of editing can confer notability on someone. 331dot (talk) 20:14, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- Not to mention the drafting process has not always been in place. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 06:58, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
21:20:10, 12 September 2021 review of submission by Tony1985sept
[edit]- Tony1985sept (talk · contribs)
Tony1985sept (talk) 21:20, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Kindly re-review the draft, the subject is much notable as well as it have independent and reliable references. Let me know, if there is any mistake. I didn't believe that subject is not notable.Tony1985sept (talk) 21:23, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- Tony1985sept The draft was rejected, meaning it will not be considered further. Please review the comments left by reviewers. 331dot (talk) 22:09, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
23:22:16, 12 September 2021 review of submission by Userfailbot
[edit]- Userfailbot (talk · contribs)
please review my article and publish it thankyou Userfailbot (talk) 23:22, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
- You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 23:27, 12 September 2021 (UTC)