Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 November 8
Appearance
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< November 7 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | November 9 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
November 8
[edit]06:26:40, 8 November 2021 review of submission by Mercy k
[edit]
Hello,
Could you please give me an advice to improve about this page.
Mercy k (talk) 06:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Mercy k: Don't write spam articles. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 07:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
16:21:43, 8 November 2021 review of draft by Bpnmmg
[edit]
Hi, I was informed that there aren't significant references for the article I am trying to publish. I believe this is not the case. I 've cited articles on 3 different magazines, which appear on Google News too, apart from youtube channels etc. Could I get some help?
Thanks!
Bpnmmg (talk) 16:21, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Bpnmmg: The article has several issues. The tone inappropriate for an encyclopedia. It's written like a fan website profile. The language is too fawning and florid - it needs to be more encyclopedic. Text like this is problematic. Despite being new to the scene, they became notable for their fresh music, aggressive lyrical delivery and fast catchy rap flows, while their real life lyrics are highly appreciated by the listeners. The sources are weak, and #6 doesn't seem to be about the band at all. I marked one as dead. Lastly, but of least concern is the format. There's too much bolded text and all caps, which detracts from the article. Are there any reviews of their album? TechnoTalk (talk) 21:53, 14 November 2021 (UTC)