Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 April 23

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< April 22 << Mar | April | May >> April 24 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


April 23

[edit]

Request on 01:39:16, 23 April 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Khogendrarupiniofficial1

[edit]



Khogendrarupiniofficial1 (talk) 01:39, 23 April 2021 (UTC) Why you are rejected me[reply]

Unfortunately, we can't have articles about everyone on Earth. We thus only allow articles about notable people, who generally have received coverage in reliable sources such as books, newspapers, and magazines. The lion's share of students, such as you, don't meet that threshold. You might prefer to tell the world about yourself through another forum, such as social media or a personal website. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:37, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

09:47:42, 23 April 2021 review of submission by Padma88

[edit]


Alagar Ramanujam have contributed much to society through both scientific community and service streams. Please check all the references provided and accept. Padma88 (talk) 09:47, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Padma88 The draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 09:50, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

10:13:34, 23 April 2021 review of submission by ZexTer9999

[edit]


ZexTer9999 (talk) 10:13, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 13:05, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

12:21:29, 23 April 2021 review of submission by HroPhibrAd

[edit]


You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 13:03, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:10:36, 23 April 2021 review of submission by Ethan Money Muter

[edit]

Hi, I don't know what you're saying by the sources aren't good enough. Please could you specify what you'd like me to do! Ethan Money Muter (talk) 13:10, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You submitted several times without providing any INDEPENDENT reliable source so I rejected your draft. You will need to provide at least three independent, reliable Wikipedia:Reliable sources - the sources given right now are commercial, promotional ones. CommanderWaterford (talk) 13:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


13:28:08, 23 April 2021 review of draft by Ebenedara

[edit]


I am trying to submit a page for the President of Christ Apostolic Church but being declined. I have seen other pages that are not as detailed as this and being approved.

What else do you want me to add?

Ebenedara (talk) 13:28, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:46:20, 23 April 2021 review of draft by Efakta

[edit]


I've added my first draft article in English to wiki. My question is 1. whether the sources in the Reference list are reliable. 2. can I add the appropriate wiki article in Georgian as a URL. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ISET_Policy_Institute

Efakta (talk) 13:46, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:57:46, 23 April 2021 review of submission by Mariappantuty

[edit]


Mariappantuty (talk) 13:57, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mariappantuty You don't ask a question, but your draft was a blatant advertisement. 331dot (talk) 15:24, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

16:39:27, 23 April 2021 review of draft by Abhijit-Phanse

[edit]


I wrote an article to help creating image for my company in Wikipedia, can you please share some insights why my article is declined.

Abhijit-Phanse (talk) 16:39, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Abhijit-Phanse Wikipedia has no interest in helping your company's image. Wikipedia is not a place for companies to tell the world about themselves; Wikipedia is an encyclopedia where independent editors summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a topic, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of notability. If you want to tell the world about your company, you should use social media or its own website.
You will need to review conflict of interest and paid editing for information on required formal disclosures. (I see you declared a COI but you need to make the stricter paid editing declaration, a terms of use requirement) 331dot (talk) 19:51, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:47:37, 23 April 2021 review of submission by 2402:3A80:1836:F2E6:0:22:B722:3B01

[edit]


2402:3A80:1836:F2E6:0:22:B722:3B01 (talk) 17:47, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning it will not be considered further, because it is completely unsourced and does not indicate how the person meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable person. 331dot (talk) 19:53, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]