Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2019 February 24

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< February 23 << Jan | February | Mar >> February 25 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


February 24

[edit]

03:14:22, 24 February 2019 review of submission by Munmuncmeri

[edit]

How COI would be declaired in above said draft.

Munmuncmeri (talk) 03:14, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Munmuncmeri. In this edit you placed {{Connected contributor}} and {{UserboxCOI}} templates on the draft. Those templates are used to declare a conflict of interest (COI), but you placed them on the wrong page.
  • The Connected contributor belongs on the draft's talk page. I've moved it for you and filled it in.
  • The UserboxCOI belongs on your user page. It can be helpful to also write a few words about the nature of your COI, such as "Arup Baidya and I are family", or "I have coached Arup Baidya", or whatever the case may be.
--Worldbruce (talk) 15:11, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:42:36, 24 February 2019 review of draft by Raktim21494

[edit]


From where will i get my decline reason code? I just want to inform the author that i have fixed the issues and have re submitted my article but to inform i need put in the decline reason code, where will i be able to see that?

Raktim21494 (talk) 11:42, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Raktim21494. To resubmit the draft, click the blue "Resubmit" button in the big pink box at the top of the draft. There is no need to inform anyone; the draft will likely be reviewed by a different reviewer each time it is submitted. Decline reason codes are mainly a software construct, most people would not know what you were talking about if you told them the code.
Before you resubmit, reconsider the changes you've made. The sourcing is worse than it was the first time, as I've explained in detail on the draft. You've made no progress towards showing that the farm is notable (suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). --Worldbruce (talk) 16:09, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:19:01, 24 February 2019 review of draft by Jdgan212

[edit]


My article, Draft:Jann Anderegg, has insufficient sources and I need help completing it. Jdgan212 (talk) 12:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jdgan212. A more realistic assessment of the situation is that the draft lacks sufficient sources because little or nothing has been written about Jann Anderegg in independent, reliable, secondary sources. Therefore Wikipedia does not need, and should not have, an article on the topic. If you wish to improve the encyclopedia, see Wikipedia:Community portal for how to help. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:12:44, 24 February 2019 review of submission by Ronnykar9

[edit]


The person is a legitimate student activist and a wiki page is required for information about him. The article was rejected due to member finding citation - winner of non-notable academic contest. which I think is untrue, as it was a pan India event conducted by the economic forum however. I have removed the line and citation. Hopefully, this is acceptable

Ronnykar9 (talk) 16:12, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ronnykar9. No, Shailesh Singhal is not notable (does not meet Wikipedia's inclusion criteria). --Worldbruce (talk) 16:23, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:10:22, 24 February 2019 review of draft by Crazygamer7477

[edit]


My list can't be sorted correctly. It does it by the first digit which is weird. So it could do something like 19 then 109 then 21 then 31 then 410 then 52.

Crazygamer7477 (talk) 18:10, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Crazygamer7477. See Help:Sorting, particularly the use of data-sort-type. --Worldbruce (talk) 22:24, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:43:47, 24 February 2019 review of submission by Tmmoney

[edit]


Polly Adams is a notable person that needs a listing on Wikipedia. Information has been added about her and additional information about her actors union work that is vital to performers today. She more notable than Polly Adams the British Actress of the same name. Tmmoney (talk) 18:43, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


18:48:38, 24 February 2019 review of draft by 2405:204:2001:422:282A:BEAF:51DF:F680

[edit]


Dear Editors,

It has been quite a while since the draft (Draft:Moran Cerf) is not reviewed. I will really be greatful to you if you review this draft.

Thanks a million!

2405:204:2001:422:282A:BEAF:51DF:F680 (talk) 18:48, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was submitted five days ago. The current backlog is seven weeks. --Worldbruce (talk) 22:33, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Worldbruce: Thanks for your response. I agree with you that I've submitted the draft 5 days ago. I would really appreciate it if you could review it and see if it meets Wikipedia guidelines. Thanks so much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:2001:422:282A:BEAF:51DF:F680 (talk) 15:34, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:49:12, 24 February 2019 review of submission by Aguncan

[edit]


I have drafted a article about Age-Stage Two sex life table which was recently used a proper tool to measure population paramteres of especially insects. I have sent for review, and the reviewer "Mgbo120" sent a comment like this

"No actual topic being discussed. The entire content appears incoherent. Seems to be copied from another source. This needs proper rewrite to suit wiki guidelines."

It is very superficial comment. My content is not copied from somewhere else (I have checked it from a plagarism software), I have done alot of work to review this. I will update further in time. I do not what to do. I am very dissapointed from this.

Best, Ali

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age-Stage,_Two-Sex_Life_Table


Aguncan (talk) 18:49, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

20:02:48, 24 February 2019 review of submission by 2604:2000:69CB:5500:4047:3132:BAC6:1FE6

[edit]


Qualifies for the notable person. Has more credits then Polly Adams, British Actress. Active role in actors unions.

2604:2000:69CB:5500:4047:3132:BAC6:1FE6 (talk) 20:02, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@2604:2000:69CB:5500:4047:3132:BAC6:1FE6: - sheer number of credits is irrelevant. It's having multiple major roles in major TV/Film/Stage shows. Guest or recurring isn't sufficient. Her work in the unions doesn't look to be notable, as it would require significant coverage of her in that field to satisfy.
If you think she does have sufficient major performances, then highlighting the 3/4 most suitable credits would aid any discussion over her notability. Nosebagbear (talk) 20:31, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2019_February_24&oldid=885760629"