Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 March 14
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < March 13 | << Feb | March | Apr >> | March 15 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
March 14
[edit]04:29:43, 14 March 2018 review of submission by Ansoliwen24
[edit]- Ansoliwen24 (talk · contribs)
Ansoliwen24 (talk) 04:29, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
please why did my page brought down
Ansoliwen24 (talk) 04:29, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hello Ansoliwen24, did you read the advice given in the large Pink box at the top of your Draft? If you read WP:Notability (music) it gives very clear guidelines as to what is needed for musician articles. MatthewVanitas (talk) 08:38, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
04:52:55, 14 March 2018 review of submission by Milezinator
[edit]- Milezinator (talk · contribs)
My article submission was declined with no explanation. Please tell me why it is not suitable for acceptance. Milezinator (talk) 04:52, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Milezinator - The reviewer left a few explinations, which I'll transcribe below:
Comment: Comment: Please see the Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features) guideline. The draft only cites map coordinates. It needs more in-depth coverage to establish notability. • Gene93k (talk) 2:44 pm, 12 March 2018, last Monday (2 days ago) (UTC+0)
Please see the link included for more information on the guidelines surrounding inclusion for lakes and other geographical features. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:41, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
08:18:09, 14 March 2018 review of submission by AlanoudAlmuh
[edit]- AlanoudAlmuh (talk · contribs)
- Hello AlanoudAlmuh, what is your question?
- Also, your sandbox appears to be a duplicate of Draft:Khalid Waleed AlKhudair. If you already have a draft page, please make all improvements on that same page and then submit. If you make multiple copies it leads to a very confusing Draft process. So please move anything from your sandbox that you want to keep onto your main draft, Draft:Khalid Waleed AlKhudair. MatthewVanitas (talk) 08:37, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Jeric Nunez (talk · contribs)
Hi! Wikipedia, I'm Jeric,a beginner and new to Wikipedia.I'm trying to make my own page and honestly I'm not good enough.All informations at my article are came from myself and was given to me.What would I need do to overcome this problem?Because reviewers says I need to add Citations, Source,and References.
Thank you for your support.
Jeric Nunez (talk) 08:54, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hello Jeric Nunez, the simple answer is: provide sources like the reviewer said. Information that "came from myself" is not at all usable, because none of us know who you are (and it doesn't matter anyway) and so there's no reason for us just to assume that everything is true. If you cannot prove a fact with a citation to a good source (gov't website, news article, book, etc) then the reader cannot believe it, so you need to source any facts you claim.
- Also, please take a look at WP:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines which gives some very good advice as to what should appear in a school article. MatthewVanitas (talk) 08:34, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
12:59:41, 14 March 2018 review of draft by Backwellian
[edit]- Backwellian (talk · contribs)
I have created a New article for William Arkle, and want to submit it for consideration - but I am unsure whether or not it actually has been submitted?
Backwellian (talk) 12:59, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Backwellian, simply click the "submit for review" in the teal coloured box at the top. I have submitted this on your behalf however. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 13:39, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
14:58:57, 14 March 2018 review of submission by Lightgreendarkgreen
[edit]Hi,
I submitted an article on Masternodes a few days ago and it got rejected because it appeared to "read more like an advertisement". However, I was not trying to promote anything, but simply write something on an increasingly popular subject. When using Google Trends to compare the terms "masternode" and "dashcoin", it can be noticed that the latter is receiving less attention than the former, and nonetheless it does have a Wikipedia page. Please advise on what I could do to publish the Masternode article.
Also, the article has been deleted and I received the following comment on the draft page: "Recurrent draft o fa previously speedy deleted draft.". If I did, in fact, have multiple drafts, it was unintentional and I was wondering if the deletion action can be undone?
Thank you! Lightgreendarkgreen (talk) 14:58, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hello Lightgreendarkgreen, since the page is deleted we can't see it, but if you want it back your best bet is to post on the Talk page of the person who deleted it: User talk:Jimfbleak.
- If you just say "give it back please" they are unlikely to return it to you, but if you briefly explain how you intend to promptly change/improve the draft to avoid any appearance of advertising, that would probably help, unless it was absolutely blatant advertising and you would be better off starting from scratch.
- And where are you seeing an article for Dashcoin? It appears to be a non-working link? Or is it under a different title? MatthewVanitas (talk) 08:32, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, MatthewVanitas, thanks so much for taking the time to reply and for the advice! You're right, the correct page title is Dash (cryptocurrency). All the best! Lightgreendarkgreen (talk) 10:39, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello! I am writing because my article was rejected with only stating that this is not a person of note. As far as I can tell, all of the references cited are sound. I don't understand the rejection here.
Spngejen (talk) 16:15, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Spngejen: The references show that the information in the article is factual. However we have a set of criteria that we use to determine which people should have a biography about them on Wikipedia and which should not. The basic criteria (see WP:BASIC) is evidence that multiple reliable, independent publications have written about them in depth. The requirements are rather more nuanced than that because we don't consider media articles that are based on a corporate press release to be an independent source. Most of the references in your draft appear to have been based on press releases. Nor do we consider interviews with the person as an independent source, which rules out at least one of the references you've provided. So for this draft, it looks like Heliosxeros (the reviewer) has concluded that, having reviewed each reference, there's very little left to indicate that this person belongs in an encyclopedia.
- May I ask, is this an autobiography? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:43, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
I am seeking assistance on how to best write a company description submission. The company is called Membran Entertainment Group and is involved with music distribution, marketing, and other services. They are based in Hamburg, Germany. What information are wikipedia editors looking for with regards to company history and operations. Rcalvin5 (talk) 17:38, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
- @Rcalvin5: Ok so the company exists but why does an article about it belong in an encyclopedia? If multiple independent, reliable publications have already written about the company because their editorial teams thought it was notable, then great - it probably belongs in Wikipedia. But if not, please understand that Wikipedia isn't a directory with an article about every company that exists. And it is certainly not a place for free advertising. We only have articles about companies that meet the criteria. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:48, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
- Rcalvin5 - Endorse all of the above. I'd also mention that the coverage itself should be independent, as well as the source. Many companies get media coverage through PR-driven "interviews", notices, etc. Such coverage is unlikely to be acceptable. KJP1 (talk) 18:33, 14 March 2018 (UTC)