Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2018 February 23
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < February 22 | << Jan | February | Mar >> | February 24 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
February 23
[edit]04:55:47, 23 February 2018 review of draft by Fabzanna
[edit]
Fabzanna (talk) 04:55, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
i keep getting a message that my article is a 'draft' article and will not be reviewed. I keep pressing the submit page for review but keep getting pushed back to the 'this is a draft article'. How do I submit it for review?
- Hi Fabzanna - The article has been submitted for review. Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:14, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Nuurrasyiid (talk · contribs)
Hi! I have to creat a wiki page for my company, but i can only write in my sandbox and i cant change the articles to company name/brand. How to do it?
Nuurrasyiid (talk) 05:20, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Nuurrasyiid. You appear to have moved beyond User:Nuurrasyiid/sandbox and be working on Draft:Teraju, so I don't understand your question. Note that most companies are unsuitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, and it is unwise to write about a topic with which you have a conflict of interest. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:18, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
06:24:07, 23 February 2018 review of submission by Tatyana Malaysian
[edit]
Tatyana Malaysian 06:24, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
This page was having AFC pending submission by age/9 days, but it is increasing constantly but with no changes. Today it reached to 11 days. Expected review time is increasing as it was one month, now it is two.
I don't know when it will be reviewed. Please keep this in account and have a look.
Tatyana Malaysian 06:24, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Tatyana Malaysian. The draft is in the pool to be reviewed. Given the current backlog, it likely will be reviewed by mid-April. You may continue to work on it while you wait. At present, it isn't clear from the draft that the subject is notable (suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). User generated content, such as bookofachievers.com, is not a reliable source. The draft needs to cite publications that are independent and reliable, as The Times of India is, but those publications also need to contain significant coverage of the subject, not just one sentence. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:34, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
08:48:07, 23 February 2018 review of submission by Marcomdeptt
[edit]- Marcomdeptt (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
Marcomdeptt (talk) 08:48, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
why was my article declined
- Hi Marcomdeptt. As explained more fully on your talk page, Draft:Electronic Payment and Services Pvt Ltd could not be accepted because it copied copyrighted content without evidence of permission. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:52, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
12:53:07, 23 February 2018 review of submission by Ihechi Opara
[edit]FIRST ENTER THE PAGENAME FOR THE DRAFT YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ABOUT ON THE LINE BELOW. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ihechi_Opara
THEN TELL US WHY YOU ARE REQUESTING ASSISTANCE BELOW THIS LINE. Take as many lines as you need. -->}}
Why has this article not been reviewed and published? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ihechi Opara (talk • contribs) 12:53, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Ihechi Opara. Draft:Ihechi Opara has not been reviewed because you have not submitted it for review. To do so, add the template
{{subst:submit}}to the top of the draft and click the "Publish changes" button. Once it is in the pool of submitted drafts, it will be reviewed within about two months. If the review finds it unsuitable for publication, the reviewer will explain why on the draft and on your talk page. Note that autobiographies are strongly discouraged. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:45, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
16:18:09, 23 February 2018 review of submission by Jakencva
[edit]
Hello, I'm trying to get an article regarding the 2018 MAC men's basketball tournament published. 30 of the 32 men's tournaments have published articles, but a reviewer has twice blocked my attempts to create an article for the MAC. The first explanation was that the article was "TOOSOON", even though the tournament begins next week and all but two conference tournaments now have published articles. The second explanation was that there were insufficient external sources, but the article now has four major media sources, more than the vast majority of articles regarding 2018 men's basketball conference tournaments.
Jakencva (talk) 16:18, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, Jakencva. Compared to most tournament articles, especially at this start, this one is more than ready for submission. Please submit it again and it should be accepted. JTP (talk • contribs) 05:21, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Done Published. MatthewVanitas (talk) 11:57, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
17:32:17, 23 February 2018 review of submission by Handegurdogan
[edit]
Hello, I submitted an article on Intellia Therapeutics earlier and it has been declined on Jan 22nd. I reviewed my submission, corrected the sidebar and added five new citations from very credible resources (Financial Times, Wall St Journal and New Scientist). I would like to publish this article at your earliest convenience. Is there a way this article is reviewed faster than the first submission since I am submitting it for the second time? I appreciate your understanding and assistance.
I didn't receive an email from Wikipedia when my first submission was rejected. That's why I realized it almost one month later than it has been rejected, when I logged in to my Wiki account and saw the notification. Would you please email me when the article is reviewed?
Handegurdogan (talk) 17:32, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
On hold pending paid editing disclosure, see User talk:Handegurdogan#Declare any connection. --Worldbruce (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
