Help desk
< April 13	<< Mar \| April \| May >>	Current help desk >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

April 14

13:34:41, 14 April 2018 review of submission by Stevenknieling

Stevenknieling (talk · contribs)

Hello FITINDIA, Greetings! First of all I would like to thank you for reviewing the first article posted under my name. I have seen the deleted article Siavash Arani G11 and tried changing the tone to neutral and resubmit it with new links after doing an in-depth research. These are at least 6 independent links that were not created by subject. I added them to justify notability of the subject and to show his study and work. Links are listed below:

The review made states that the subject reads more like an advertisement. Therefore, I would like to know about the area on body of article you would like to see the change so that I can make the edits to comply with the Wikipedia guidelines. I would love to have a helping hand to get the article through. Any help rendered will be highly appreciated. Thank you in anticipation Steven Knieling

Steven Knieling 13:34, 14 April 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevenknieling (talk • contribs)

13:45:17, 14 April 2018 review of submission by Aleksandr Reznichenko

Aleksandr Reznichenko (talk · contribs)

I'm not sure what exactly is wrong.

First I found lots of reliable sources that are independent of the subject, such as New York Post, the Telegraf, Mirror, etc. Russian VGTRK, Russia Today, Echo of Moscow radio, etc.

Second I have expanded the cultural aspect and added UFO theories with 3 reliable observers, observing 'Pyramod' directly, Nick Pope, Nicolai Levashov and Kosmopoisk.

The article itself is at the Categories of viral videos, also UFO. And 'Pyramid' fits these categories as long as video became viral and sparkled mass-media reaction and buzzed ufology society. Looks like the subject of the page, the 'Pyramid over Moscow' is significant enough for Wiki; and that's me who's doing something wrong with the text

Thanks in advance for help. Aleksandr Reznichenko (talk) 13:45, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Currently being answered at WP:Teahouse. MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:06, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

16:54:27, 14 April 2018 review of draft by 108.204.65.73

108.204.65.73 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Shenmue 1&2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I couldn’t font cover art plz help me 108.204.65.73 (talk) 16:54, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite sure as to the question but you haven't got any sources for the article. That will be more of a problem than the absence of artwork. KJP1 (talk) 17:27, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

16:56:17, 14 April 2018 review of submission by Ponjit1234

Ponjit1234 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Guwahati Police Commissionerate (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I want to know about the change from Non Government to Government Ponjit1234 (talk) 16:56, 14 April 2018 (UTC) I want to know how it is possible to change the status from Non Government to Government.Ponjit1234 (talk) 16:56, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

23:11:37, 14 April 2018 review of submission by Tom Berkshire

Tom Berkshire (talk · contribs)

Hello how are you? I have seen your review, sorry but I don´t understand why you think that the references are not adequate, since they are government and NGO pages, recognized media, academic articles and books by renowned writers (Child Welfare, Sociology and others. If you say this because of the references that contain interviews or quotes, I know that these texts can not be used as references, but I understood that the comments and statements made by the authors or the interviewers are valid. For example, reference 20 is intended to demonstrate the existence of Genesis, without taking into account what its Director says there. Thank you! Tom Berkshire (talk) 23:11, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Berkshire (talk) 23:11, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tom Berkshire - Did you read my review comment, which said that the article is more about what the organization says about itself than what others have written about it? The organizational notability guidelines focus on independent coverage of the organization by third parties in reliable sources. Have others written about Generations of Hope?

Also, do you have an affiliation or connection with Generations of Hope? Robert McClenon (talk) 18:48, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]