Help desk
< June 18	<< May \| June \| Jul >>	June 20 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

June 19

06:39:12, 19 June 2017 review of submission by Bmoy94

Bmoy94 (talk · contribs)
- User talk:Innova Market Insights (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I submitted an article Innova Market Insights. It was recently reviewed but unfortunately, it didn't get approved due to the referencing part. Could you try to explain to me why in more details please? Also, could you help me about how to improve? Thank you. Bmoy94 (talk) 06:39, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE: Question has been answered at WP:Teahouse#Advice on referencing notability. NewYorkActuary (talk) 12:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

17:45:43, 19 June 2017 review of submission by Prairiefire2

Prairiefire2 (talk · contribs)

Regarding Draft: Election Audits ... I submitted the Election audits article for review five weeks ago and was told review would take three weeks. I responded to the first editor's comment; the last message I received regarding its review was from Dodger61, if that helps. Prairiefire2 (talk) 17:45, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

21:34:39, 19 June 2017 review of submission by Slovo69

Slovo69 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Chris McCafferty (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I had not intended to send my article for publication just yet, I do not know how it came to be considered for deletion or otherwise as I was still in the process of adding references. Is it possible to have more time to include the references? Slovo69 (talk) 21:34, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Slovo. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Your submission is being considered for deletion because the nominator believes that the submission will never be ready for publication. I assume you disagree and, if so, you should participate in the discussion that is currently taking place. You will find a link to that discussion in the box at the top of your submission but, for your convenience, we'll repeat it here -- WP:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Chris_McCafferty. I hope this response has been helpful. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:39, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Slovo69. The best argument against deletion is to add references to three independent, reliable sources that cover McCafferty in some depth. In future, always start with the sources and write the text based on what they say, rather than writing some text and then looking for sources. If the draft is deleted, you may continue looking for sources. If you find them, you may create another draft. If you don't find them, write about something else - we have millions of articles, most of which can be improved, see how to help at Wikipedia:Community portal. --Worldbruce (talk) 00:03, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]