Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2017 August 30
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < August 29 | << Jul | August | Sep >> | August 31 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
August 30
[edit]00:48:21, 30 August 2017 review of submission by MG-Lon
[edit]
Hello , i'm sorry if Offended you. However Iam simply trying to ge the article on wikipedia, we thought met the criteria. I thought it was more so my referencing. We shall try again at later date when we have more credible sources as I have been quoted a few times.
Thanks for your time.
- @MG-Lon: Hello, MG. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Our apologies for the delay in response. I'm not sure that I see an actual question here but, if there is one, feel free to let us know. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:44, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
08:26:45, 30 August 2017 review of submission by 68.175.131.44
[edit]- 68.175.131.44 (talk · contribs)
- No draft specified!
68.175.131.44 (talk) 08:26, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Please how can someone assist to select reference on the Subject Draft Ejembi John Onah that just fits independent source?
- Hello, IP address. Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Our apologies for the delay in response. I assume you are asking about Draft:Ejembi John Onah. If so, the most recent reviewer was quite clear about their suggestion -- identify three sources that you think demonstrate encyclopedic notability and ask us whether we agree that they do make that demonstration. Are you now asking us to do that for you? But the whole point of the suggestion is that you -- the person most familiar with the subject -- identify the sources. If I've misunderstood your question, please let us know. And if you have any other questions, feel free to ask. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:53, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- P.S. I just saw that you posted again below. Feel free to respond under either posting. NewYorkActuary (talk) 23:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
- Vlaurentius (talk · contribs)
Dear Sirs, I've tried to follow the guidelines and I've added several links from primary sources. However I still see the same critics. Please tell me what I am still doing wrong. Thank you very much in advance
VL 10:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- Draft:Maurits Roland Falkenreck (v. Falken-Reck) is strangely named. What is the "v. Falken-Reck"? A variant of his name? Or a title, starting "van"?
- It is written as one large paragraph, making it unreadable.
- The references are not cited correctly. Please read Referencing for beginners.
- It contains promotional (and largely meaningless) language such as "he learned from a young age how to take his concepts/ideas to the next level". Maproom (talk) 12:41, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
21:16:15, 30 August 2017 review of submission by 68.175.131.44
[edit]
Based on the comments on talk forum on the subject by Jmcgnh yesterday advising that the subject select 3 best references that can satisfy notability, the subject has 3 such references with citations in peer review journal totaling, 131, 103 and 7 counting totalling 241 and counting, can that be ok for notability? Further other work the subject is doing includes pioneering nano activities in 189 countries in association with global leaders of the field in academic, policy makers and private sector
68.175.131.44 (talk) 21:16, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- Oh, I thought you would log in with your username.
- First you need to tell me the theory you are using to support notability under WP:NPROF.
- Second, using bare citation counts is perhaps supportive but not all by itself sufficient to establish notability.
- Third, we have seen the assertion in the article about all the work Onah has done and the organizations he has worked with, but some note of that has to have been taken by a publication that is not directly associated with Onah. It's a citation to that publication that can be used to help establish notability. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 23:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC)