Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2016 November 25
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< November 24 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | November 26 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
November 25
[edit]13:26:34, 25 November 2016 review of submission by David.moreno72
[edit]- Username missing!
I am wondering as to why this article was declined. I would appreciate help and guidance on this. Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Baba Iqbal Singh - Baru Sahib and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. David.moreno72 10:16, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Rbykohli (talk) 13:26, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- You may want to see WP:REFB for help on referencing and WP:FOOTNOTES for help on using footnotes. JTP (talk • contribs) 20:05, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
15:22:46, 25 November 2016 review of submission by WaqasT
[edit]
So my article was declined for the third time, and the reviewer said "The concern is that this would need reviews to finally convince accepting." Now, I would like to know if any of these reviews is acceptable, accepted before I submit again (have not yet added them to the article, except the softpedia one);
- http://www.orms-today.org/orms-4-00/swr.html
- http://processmodel.software.informer.com/5.3/
- http://www.softpedia.com/get/Others/Finances-Business/ProcessModel.shtml
- http://www.qualitydigest.com/aug00/html/software.html
- http://www.qualitydigest.com/april00/html/apps4.html
- http://www.qualitydigest.com/may01/html/simulation.html
If you would also be kind enough to tell me what 'Cite' option I should use, that would be great.
- I have a question. Your only edits have been to this draft and to inquiries about its acceptance. Do you have a connection with the product and its vendor? If so, please declare your connection in accordance with the conflict of interest guideline. If not, welcome to Wikipedia; you can also help us in many other ways with the five million articles that we already have, as well as with one article that we do not yet have. Some new editors do not understand that creating a new article, with references, is the most difficult task in Wikipedia. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:16, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
- I do not have any affiliation with the product or the vendor. I have studied discrete simulation at school where I was taught with this software. I have compiled a list of over 20 published articles where I wish to contribute and 2 more articles that I would like to publish. I took this article as the first step towards trying to gain experience in what it takes. I would really appreciate help on this. In the meantime, I will start helping out where I can. --WaqasT (talk) 02:01, 27 November 2016 (UTC)