Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2016 November 23
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < November 22 | << Oct | November | Dec >> | November 24 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
November 23
[edit]07:25:50, 23 November 2016 review of submission by Kumarappanghelliah
[edit]Kumarappanghelliah (talk) 07:34, 23 November 2016 (UTC) can you rewieu my draft? can you help me with article?
- Hello, Kumarappanghelliah. Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. Your draft has already been reviewed multiple times and the reviewers have already offered suggestions on how the article can be improved. Your first step in improving your submission will be to follow the advice given to you by those reviewers. I'll also note that, even after you have addressed the concerns of those reviewers, you will still face the task of finding reliable third-party references for all of the statements that you make in the draft. You might want to read WP:Your first article, our introduction to writing articles. NewYorkActuary (talk) 15:49, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- There are several problems with your draft that have been identified but not addressed by you. You still haven't started the draft with the name of the village. If the article is about the village, it should start with the name of the village, then telling what region of what state in India the village is in (if the village is in India). Also, much of the language is written in the first person plural as "we", which may make sense to you as the viewpoint of the villagers, but Wikipedia is always written in the third person. It isn't the villagers talking to the reader; it is Wikipedia talking to the reader. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:46, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
09:05:25, 23 November 2016 review of submission by Deepakkparashar
[edit]Hi Admin, the draft I created was for a company, they are active from 2014. I created the draft with all the facts available and cited the reliable independent sources (like economictimes, businessline, etc.). The reason for decline that I received is that the references are not reliable and need improvement. I would suggest that please check once again, provided references are from sources like deccan chronicle, economictimes, that are big names itself. And they covered company's journey and operations quite well. I would urge if we add this page, other users can also add up new facts with more references that would make the page a well deserved entry for Wikipedia. The company is growing well as I noticed in some given references, so request you to reconsider the inclusion. Thanks Deepakkparashar (talk) 09:05, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
- Hello, Deepak. Thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. The best source of information as to why your submission was declined is the reviewer who looked at it. You'll find that person's name, as well as a button to their Talk page, at the top of your draft. But my reading of their reasoning suggests that the reviewer was not questioning the reliability of the sources, but whether they served to demonstrate that the subject meets Wikipedia's notion of "notability". For that, you will need to show that the subject has been discussed in depth by multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Your draft doesn't do this, being little more than a description of the subject's products/services and its initial funding. I hope this was helpful. NewYorkActuary (talk) 15:59, 23 November 2016 (UTC)