Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2016 January 15
Help desk | ||
---|---|---|
< January 14 | << Dec | January | Feb >> | January 16 > |
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
January 15
[edit]12:56:44, 15 January 2016 review of submission by Chandansqlexpert
[edit]
Dear Sir
our article was for a school and is declined even its article is available in newspaper(Dainik Jagaran Newspaper) and is widely read by local people here in India in Hindi language. Our School is definitely notable by the people and its visibility/notability has been identified in Indian newspaper also. From my point of view any school is notable and is for public , can you please help me on this ? Thanks
Chandansqlexpert (talk) 12:56, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
13:49:54, 15 January 2016 review of submission by Gullu123
[edit]
Gullu123 (talk) 13:49, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Pl let me know the reason for rejection & what improvement require to get approved.
- @Gullu123: Hello, and welcome to the Help Desk. It seems that your draft, Draft:Acharya Usha Ranjan Mukherjee, has been deleted due to inactivity. If you would like to have the draft restored so you can continue to work on it, please follow the procedure listed at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13. Thanks! /wiae ★ /tlk 13:53, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
14:42:59, 15 January 2016 review of submission by Penslips
[edit]
I've been working on my article since last year: Dean Faulkner Wells - who is the niece of William Faulkner. I've submitted it twice, but to my surprise it was declined due to "notability". For the past 6 months I've been doing research off-line in order to locate further materials to add to my article. Last week I received an email that my article was deleted - but this is unclear to me. Upon reviewing my account, the version I last worked on was still available - and I was just able to add two more, hopefully noteworthy, lines. I just resubmitted the article for review. After submitting I saw a second note sent to me stating that I am not allowed to work in my draft any longer: Dean Faulkner Wells (2). Why? Can someone please help.
Also, I do not know what else I can do to get this article published. I've certainly seen articles on Wiki with much less and yet they are published. Dean Faulkner Wells was notable as an editor and author. Even though she has been deceased for a long time now, I was able to retrieve what I thought was a good amount of references in order for the article to be approved. I do not know where to go from here. I am at a complete loss. Any assistance would be GREATLY appreciated.
Penslips (talk) 14:42, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
17:04:12, 15 January 2016 review of submission by Windeditor00999
[edit]Part of the reason why the most recent submission got declined, according to the reviewer this time, is that references in non-English languages were used. As I was looking for assistance from the previous reviewer, I stated that since most of the company's services are based in China, there may not be as much media coverage in English. And he or she approved of me using non-English references. I'm very confused about the sources I am supposed to use in the article, so I appreciate that if someone can give me a detailed explanation. Also, as I was referencing to other companies that do similar business as we do. I noticed that Goldwind's page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwind only listed one third-party source, and its page has been approved. If possible, could you tell me what our page is missing in comparison to Goldwind's? Thank you.
Windeditor00999 (talk) 17:04, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
17:18:54, 15 January 2016 review of submission by Jesus Rey-Joly
[edit]Hi, User:Jesus Rey-Joly. I just had a look at the draft. I clicked through on some of the references and there are some problems. If you haven't already done so, go read wp:rs which is the page about "reliable sources." You've used some sources that don't meet the criteria there. For example, the svrproducciones source is a sales site, and that is not a reliable source. I know that you were intending to link to proof that the album exists, but in this case it's best not. The "list of students by teacher" and the Zoominfo entry also should be removed. If you would like, I could go through and edit out the sources that shouldnt' be there, then we could see where the gaps are. I think we can make this work. LaMona (talk) 16:45, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Hi, LaMona, I have deleted the references you mentioned and I'll be willing to do any more amendments as required. Please tell me if the draft still requires something and I'll be glad to comply.
Jesus Rey-Joly (talk) 17:18, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
18:03:40, 15 January 2016 review of submission by Cgelineli
[edit]Hi, Is there a way to see all my own questions posted in the help desk? I had asked a question before and I can't find it. Is there a way to sort to see all your own questions and answers? Thanks Cgelineli (talk)cgelineli