Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2015 May 28

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< May 27 << Apr | May | Jun >> May 29 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


May 28

[edit]

Request on 01:11:36, 28 May 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Minna.Xiao

[edit]

I want to know why my article"eChineseLearning" was deleted few times.I need more details about reasons for modifying. And i will copy my article as below,please kindly check for me

Extended content
== eChineseLearning ==

eChineseLearning is an online Chinese language school providing systematic, customized, one-on-one live instruction services to students worldwide of all ages and walks of life. [1]

Overview

[edit]

eChineseLearning adopts the teaching method of "One-to-One Instruction". One-to-One Instruction stresses individual differences in the foreign language acquisition. By analyzing the specific needs and characteristics of each learner, a Chinese teacher adjusts the pace of teaching based on the ability of each individual, designs relevant teaching curriculum and develops a series of personalized study plans and progress reports for each student based on his/her level, pace, style, and culture background.


eChineseLearning’s classes are conducted online using video conferencing tools such as Skype for live 1-to-1 lessons with professional instructors in China. Each student is assigned an instructor and classes can be taken 24 hours a day, 7 days a week and anywhere with access to the Internet. The content of each class can be customized to fit the needs of educational institutions, corporations as well as individual learners.


Every new customer gets a free trial lesson before joining eChineseLearning. The sole purpose of the free trial lesson is to show Chinese learners how the system works and how easy it is to learn Chinese online with a native Chinese teacher.[2]

  1. ^ "Live Teachers from China". eChineseLearning.com
  2. ^ "1-On-1 Live Online Free Trial Class".eChineseLearning.com
@Minna.Xiao: Your article was deleted because it contained text copied and pasted from other websites, which is against Wikipedia's copyright policy. It was declined because it read more like an advertisement, not an encyclopedia article. I cleaned up the draft a little for you to make it sound more neutral. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 14:47, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Minna.Xiao (talk) 01:11, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

03:35:56, 28 May 2015 review of submission by Becki.dang

[edit]

Hi Wiki,

As I expressed,my start in wiki got some troubles and hope that my questions will not bother you. As I read in wikipedia, I can edit the article of other authors. Hence I cliked "Edit" button at the very top of Visa policy of Vietnam article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visa_policy_of_Vietnam). I edited and saved the change successfully, and the screen showed the articles with my additional information. However after I reload the link to make sure that I have edited successfully, my editing disappeared. Please explain my case and show me how can I edit the article of other authors. Will it take time for reviewing my editing? Becki.dang (talk) 03:35, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Becki.dang: Your edit [1] was reverted shortly afterwards by Materialscientist with an edit summary of "unsourced personal opinion". I'm not surprised you were confused as you did appear to add a source in your edit, though not necessarily appropriate ones for that article. I've pinged Materialscientist so he can offer a fuller explanation here, but I think the revert is probably appropriate as your text documents what you think is the best way to get a visa for travelling in Vietnam, not what is the well-documented procedure for everybody. There's a similar problem with your draft, User:Becki.dang/sandbox/My great trip exploring the Northern Vietnam. I think that is unsuitable for Wikipedia and belongs on a blog somewhere. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:49, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

11:38:03, 28 May 2015 review of submission by 217.84.6.229

[edit]


217.84.6.229 (talk) 11:38, 28 May 2015 (UTC) what can i do, i dont know at this time?[reply]


Hello, and welcome to the Help Desk. Can you give us some more details about your question? /wia /talk 14:57, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

13:37:08, 28 May 2015 review of submission by TCVCJ

[edit]


Please give me an example of a "notability" reference for a small county park - created as a result of a massive cut for a highway - used as a family oriented free scenic, recreational facility. I could write a personal essay about the park, but am finding it difficult to find what you need in print! Thank you.TCVCJ (talk) 13:37, 28 May 2015 (UTC) TCVCJ (talk) 13:37, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia article Postman's Park is a Featured Article about a 0.67 acres (0.27 ha) park. That topic has the advantage of having rather more history behind it, and you wouldn't need that weight of references in order for an article to be accepted, but it gives examples of the types of sources that can be used. I wonder if newspaper articles about the highway, discussed the park proposal at all? Arthur goes shopping (talk) 13:57, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

13:39:38, 28 May 2015 review of submission by Vi Gonzo

[edit]


I am requesting assistance because my draft was declined. The draft that I am attempting to submit is information about my advisor Karen Cerulo. I have looked at pages for other sociologists in our department, "Eviatar Zerubavel" for example, and there pages also seem to lack the sources being requested of me. Is there a different way to submit biographical information? Are there different standards? Vi Gonzo (talk) 13:39, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Vi Gonzo: Wikipedia is monitored by volunteers, so some bad articles tend to slip through the cracks. If we let these bad articles be the standard by which all future articles are judged, the quality of articles would quickly decline. Therefore, the "What about this other article?" argument doesn't carry much weight here. Instead, try comparing your article to articles which have been ranked as Good academic biography articles or Featured academic biography articles. The Zerubavel article is a bit of a special case -- although the article lacks sources, the subject meets WP:NACADEMIC because of their Guggenheim Fellowship, and the article was created in 2006 when the standards for citing sources in biographies were much lower. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 14:38, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

13:52:25, 28 May 2015 review of submission by TCVCJ

[edit]

I have repeatedly entered newspaper articles as references - the last message said " still no references " - what am I doing wrong? And what about "notability" - newspaper and magazine (listed the last time I submitted) articles are the only printed material I am able to find!TCVCJ (talk) 13:52, 28 May 2015 (UTC) TCVCJ (talk) 13:52, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to have put the references in the edit summary, not in the Draft. Also I'm not sure those references are specific enough to be verifiable... you should consider adding things like the name of the author, the page number in the publication that the piece appeared on, and the title of the piece. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 14:19, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

19:26:56, 28 May 2015 review of submission by Clemendove99

[edit]

I am needing help as to how my article was rejected (it is completely neutral... the User Winner42 refers to heartbreaking stories in my descriptive nature of the language, but there really is absolutely no room to voice this foundation. I would like to know how I can resubmit for creation and get it approved no matter what the administrator/editors may say. It is 100% neutral.


Clemendove99 (talk) 19:26, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Clemendove99: Another reviewer might want to chime in here with more details, but I've done a bit of copyediting and tagging on the article. The draft is currently submitted for review, so an AfC reviewer should be along in the coming days or weeks to take another look. If the draft is not accepted this time, fear not. There is no strict deadline at AfC and you are welcome to keep working on the draft! /wia /talk 02:25, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies if that came across as a bit harsh, that wasn't my intent. Sometimes when people have a positive opinion of a topic, words to watch may creep in to their articles. You seem to have corrected all the issues I had with it originally, though my policy is to have another set of eyes look over and approve a draft. Winner 42 Talk to me! 03:37, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]