Help desk
< June 21	<< May \| June \| Jul >>	June 23 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

June 22

07:02:48, 22 June 2014 review of submission by Hitesh hp kumar

Hitesh hp kumar (talk · contribs)
- User:Hitesh hp kumar/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

hitesh 07:02, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Declined --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:02, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

15:11:23, 22 June 2014 review of submission by Matthewhburch

Matthewhburch (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Remote fuel propulsion (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I would like to request that this article be reviewed by someone with an understanding of jet propulsion, rocketry or space propulsion systems. Understanding the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation and how it impacts fuel requirements in standard rocketry methods is the most important request. Having a working knowledge or a strong layman's knowledge is fine.

Matthewhburch (talk) 15:11, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, but I believe the draft will be deleted after six months if no such person comes forward and you have no further improvements to the draft. The rocket scientist I know best is knowledgeable in guidance systems, not propulsion, so it would be best if you seek out an appropriate reviewer yourself. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:01, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your time, Demiurge1000. I'm not asking for a subject matter expert on the topic, only someone who understands the basics of reaction mass based propulsion systems. The article addresses an entire class of space propulsion methods which barely receive any coverage at all within Wikipedia. The content of the article is entirely based on examples of a couple methods, verifiable technologies, and routine calculations. Someone with no understanding of space propulsion systems might not recognize the technologies, and what it means that they are associated with one another, or fail to understand what the routine calculations actually demonstrate. Matthewhburch (talk) 23:21, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:14, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

At this point I would be happy just to get a reviewer that knows a bit of physics understands verifiable data and WP:CALC Matthewhburch (talk) 06:33, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

15:45:40, 22 June 2014 review of submission by Baobabus

Baobabus (talk · contribs)

Explain please what is wrong in my article and what should be corrected. Thanks! Baobabus (talk) 15:45, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:42 not met. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:56, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

20:47:35, 22 June 2014 review of draft by 65.92.21.137

Resolved - test edit was successful

65.92.21.137 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Ruxandra Bunea (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

it worked well 65.92.21.137 (talk) 20:47, 22 June 2014 (UTC) i know[reply]