Help desk
< January 21	<< Dec \| January \| Feb >>	January 23 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

January 22

Review of Lynda Elimon/Naight

Thank you Matthew Vanitas for being kind about the disinclusion of the "Lynda Elimon" bio note. I can learn what makes a good submission from this site and try writing about a singer with a bigger following. naightNaight (talk) 03:25, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maxwell_Chase

Re: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Maxwell_Chase Submission declined on 17 December 2013 by SarahStierch (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. You are encouraged to make improvements by clicking on the "Edit" tab at the top of this page. If you require extra help, ask a question at the Articles for creation help desk. You may also like to try the live help chat with experienced editors. Find sources: "Maxwell Chase" – books · scholar · JSTOR · free images.Declined by SarahStierch 35 days ago. Last edited by SarahStierch 35 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Hi, We are not very familiar with how this works but would like to inquire as to why the page created for Maxwell Chase was declined. All info on the page is accurate and verifiable on IMDb http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4098408 Maxwell Chase at the Internet Movie Database his personal website http://www.MaxwellChase.org Official Website and links for articles provided. If there is something missing in order to bring the page to date for publication please let us know so it can be rectified. We would never put his career at risk by listing false or misleading information. Thank you for your assistance, Lisa & Maxwell Chase MaxwellChase (talk) 07:08, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

IMDB is not considered a reliable source, and Maxwell's own website is not considered an independent source (therefore does nothing to help prove his notability). Suitable sources to prove his notability would be things like newspaper reviews or magazine articles that discuss his acting in depth. You may also find Wikipedia:NACTOR, the notability guidelines for actors, to be useful. Finally, you should read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and also please note that Wikipedia does not permit sharing of accounts; one account per person please. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 09:13, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/W.E Twentyman

Hello

My proposed wiki page was rejected. Can you please offer some guidance as to why?

Thank you

Paul — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moonlitdribbler (talk • contribs) 08:26, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/W.E Twentyman was declined for the reasons given in and below the pink box on that page. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 09:10, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stephen_Palmer_(author)

Hi,

I've had a couple of rejections for a new article on UK science-fiction author Stephen Palmer: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Stephen_Palmer_(author)

Both times he's been rejected on grounds of notability.

Any feedback on what we could do to get this accepted would be very much appreciated!

A little background:

Palmer has had seven novels published: two by the big commercial imprint Orbit, one by PS Publishing (a leading independent publisher that has won numerous awards, published original works by the likes of Stephen King, etc), and others by various publishers, including Wildside in the US. My article cites, among others, Palmer's entry in the SF Encyclopedia (published commercially by Gollancz in the UK, and pretty much a standard benchmark in the genre - an author with an entry in the Encyclopedia is, in the genre's terms, most definitely notable).

My own background: I'm an occasional updater of Wikipedia articles. I've been established in science-fiction publishing for the last 25 years in various writing and editorial roles, with more than 20 books to my name (most recently the Philip K Dick Award-shortlisted novel Harmony, and the academic study of SF published by Palgrave Macmillan, Strange Divisions and Alien Territories). I only mention these to establish my credentials, and to support my argument that I can recognize a notable SF author when I see one!

The article's background: Palmer asked me last year how I'd got my own Wikipedia entry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keith_Brooke); rather than simply advise him, I was so surprised that an author of his standing didn't already have an entry I went off and wrote it myself.

Hope this helps, and that we can get a Stephen Palmer (author) page established!

Keith Brooke — Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.245.61.26 (talk) 09:17, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Keith. Try adding references to a few reviews of his books then resubmitting. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 09:39, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/_Vinod_Shekhar

I am fairl new to wikipedia however i would require help on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/_Vinod_Shekhar the article did not get approved because of citations . Please advice or help. Thank you Brendanvaz1984 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brendanvaz1984 (talk • contribs) 12:27, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ljuskrona

I did not pass the review after attempting to correct the first critique. This is my first attempt to submit information. Any direction is appreciated. Giant Green Snake (talk) 15:06, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have accepted this article submission and it is now at Ljuskrona.

Please review Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and then attempt to fix the citations/references, which are currently all wrong. (You should not have external links in the body of the article text.) If you manage to fix these, please feel free to remove the {{copyedit}} template, as it will then no longer be required. There are a couple of other templates on the article noting things that could be improved. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 15:25, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ljuskrona]

I did not pass the review after attempting to correct the first critique. The validity seems to be in question. The link to the Kansas Historical Society is independent and reliable. The link to the Clarion is independent and still published under another title, "Folk Art" published by the Museum of American Folk Art. This is my first attempt to submit information. Any direction is appreciated. Giant Green Snake (talk) 15:30, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my reply above. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 15:35, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Battle of Smithfield

Regarding the submission for Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Battle of Smithfield , can you tell me why it was rejected? Thanks. Quino222 (talk) 17:27, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Quino222, did you read the detailed comments in the pink box at the top of your draft? MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:02, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Your submission name here

Hi,

Would you please let me know why my article got rejected? Thx — Preceding unsigned comment added by LogicNI (talk • contribs) 21:53, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/LogicNI was declined for the reasons given in the pink box at the top of that page. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 10:05, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Connie Corleone

I'm slightly lost. I am currently trying to make a page for Connie Corleone, which, for some reason, in 2014, does not exist on the English Wikipedia. Am I doing it right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanHakimi (talk • contribs) 23:05, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dan. Here are a few things to change.

References should go in the main body text of the article, directly after the statements that they support; not at the end of the article. Once you have placed them in the main body text of the article, they will be displayed at the end of the article when the page is viewed.
IMDB is not considered a reliable source so is not useful in proving notability of the character.
Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) has some guidance on whether a fictional character is notable, and also some links to how to write about fictional characters.
An article about a fictional character should not solely focus on plot elements, but instead should give equal weight to what reliable sources (e.g. movie reviews, magazine articles, any academic studies) have said about the significance of the character, its public image and reception, the intentions of its creator, and so on.
If citing a book as a source, it's best to include page numbers.

Hope this helps. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 09:45, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Leneka Rhoden

Leneka Rhoden,born May 21, 1997, is a fashion model at Saint International Model Agency who enjoys inspiring others. She is enthusiastic, talented, open-minded, eloquent and intellectual. She aspires to be a Motivational Speaker, Fashion Designer and Lecturer in Anatomy, Physiology and genetics. She currently attends one of the top all girl high schools in Kingston, Jamaica. In the year 2010, she was given the grand opportunity to be signed to Saint International Model Agency (one of the top model agencies in the Caribbean), from there,her life transformed. She started to blossom into a more extroverted young lady being more dedicated and determined to make her permanent mark in the fashion industry. In addition to this she started fashion designing in 2012. For all her designed pieces she has been highly commended for her fashionable unique creative style. She has much more to accomplish, and with her awesome personality, unique style, creative mind, love for fashion and determination she indeed will. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.27.150.27 (talk) 23:45, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. After she has done so, it may be the case that she is notable enough for there to be an article about her in Wikipedia; and at that point, someone unconnected with her may write one. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 10:03, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of User:Seishijuku/sandbox

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/User:Seishijuku/sandbox

I am attempting to write an article of historical significance to the evolution of karate. My article was declined due to lack of outside references. We are searching for newspaper articles and other outside independently verifiable sources. I don't know which statements I need outside references for (or which I need to remove). Would it be possible to learn which sentences are causing my article to be rejected?

Thank you for your time and consideration.

24.59.184.196 (talk) 23:53, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why not reference all of the content? There is often no need to add unreferenced information to Wikipedia - if the information cannot be referenced then where did it come from?

Certainly sentences such as "He is one of the original Kyokushinkai U.S.A. students, certified by Mastutatsu Oyama of Japan, who trained at the Brooklyn Academy of Music, under Tadashi Nakamura" would need sources.

Much of the submission also seems rather promotional. For example fact-free material like "Over many years Grandmaster Lane considered the needs of his students" and "supported, inspired and influenced intellectual, academic, success, as well as physical performance, for his students" and "introduced Seishi karate to provide effective training experiences for his students". Arthur goes shopping (talk) 09:55, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]