Help desk
< February 16	<< Jan \| February \| Mar >>	February 18 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

February 17

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Koya

Hi Koya article already exits,its one india's tribes whose name is Koya,can any one suggest on this.please check the provided below link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Will_Talk2/sandbox Regards,Will Talk2 (talk) 11:12, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission is waiting to be reviewed at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Koya. But, is the Koya tribal community a different and separate thing from the Koya (Malabar) subdivision?

If it is a different thing, then the reviewer will select a suitable article title for your submission if it is accepted. If it is not, then you should add the information to the existing article Koya (Malabar) instead of trying to create a new article. Arthur goes shopping (talk) 11:26, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,Thanks for the review,checked Koya (Malabar),is differnt from Koya Tribes,Regards,Will Talk2 (talk) 07:13, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/South Sudanese Civil War

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/South Sudanese Civil War

Hello I submitted the above named article Feb 17th however it was rejected. The reviewer left a comment article covering a the topic has already been submitted.As Wikipedia uses redirects for similar articles,I suggest that a redirect as this article contains varying and conflicting information to the one I have created.Nyachom (talk) 16:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your article cannot be created - you have to work on the article that already exists. Wikipedia never allows more than one article on a particular topic. The differences between your sources and those used in the existing article need to be resolved by discussing them on the article talk page. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:40, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Louis A. Del Monte

Hello,

My article was recently declined. Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Louis A. Del Monte The reason cited was verifiable references.

My questions follow: 1) How many third party verifiable references are required for my article?

2) For the education references, is it enough to direct the reference to the college or school website or do you require actual credentials of graduation?

3) Are the self references at all valid? For example, references to books he has written; or should these be placed in the bibliography?

4) Should I include the names and referenced websites of his employers? that is, are these considered valid references?

Thank you for your help.

Connie Krauth Connie Krauth (talk) 17:46, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Technoliberalism

Hi,

This message has come up: This sandbox is in the Wikipedia talk namespace. Either move this page into your userspace, or remove the {{User sandbox}} template.

Do I just need to delete the {{User sandbox}} part then? I am wary because on my sandbox it says and the user sandbox template is above this? Will the article still be in my sandbox if I remove the user sandbox template?

Thanks HayleySchubert (talk) 20:00, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the {{User sandbox}} template for you. The article was previously in your sandbox, it is now at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Technoliberalism. A412 (Talk • C) 20:48, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]