Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2013 April 21
| Help desk | ||
|---|---|---|
| < April 20 | << Mar | April | May >> | April 22 > |
| Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives |
|---|
| The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages. |
April 21
[edit]This article is actually a translation of the Russian Wikipedia site. I was told to create the article first, then the Russian site could be imported. There are no English sources. What can I do that the article is created? Thank you for your help. wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alexander Karasyov KomarKomar KomarKomar (talk) 17:53, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- I disagree with the reviewer's rationale; while that's rather hard on those of us who don't speak Russian, per WP:NONENG non-English sources are acceptable, though English sources obviously would be preferred. However, quite a few of your Russian sources don't seem reliable to me - for example the Russian Wikipedia (just like the English Wikipedia) is not considered a reliable source. Several others just look like websites without editorial oversight to me. Huon (talk) 22:00, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Dear Huon,
Thank you for your reply. I can see your point. If I had English sources, I would, of course, use them.:)
All of the resources I used - apart from the Wikipedia source (which I included to indicate that there is actually a Russian version of the article) - are reviewed sites. Would it help if I explained what the sources are? I could provide some sort of short summary.
They are literary journals and platforms that are reviewed by critics/reviewers. In other words, not just anyone can be put on these platforms.
KomarKomarKomarKomar (talk) 22:28, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- Megalit apparently calls itself the "Eurasian coffee portal" - are its author biographies really subject to editorial oversight? The Bunin and O. Henry Prize sources look like the organizations bestowing these awards - third-party sources would be much better. Huon (talk) 23:42, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Dear Huon,
Thank you for your reply. I will check once again and then re-submit.
Would it be a good idea to leave a comment somewhere for the editor to give reasons for the use of foreign language (non-English) sources. I would not want to have the article rejected on these grounds again. KomarKomar (talk) 05:20, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Megalit is a portal for literature journals: only for authors published in Russian literary journals.
It has nothing to do with coffee. :)KomarKomar (talk) 05:38, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
has this article in review or declinedReisae (talk) 20:21, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- This article has been declined and has been re-submitted for another review, but you haven't addressed the problems the reviewers pointed out. You still don't have evidence of significant coverage in reliable third-party sources. The best of the bunch is the JunkArchive review, but for all I can tell that's just a blog without editorial oversight, not a reliable source. Huon (talk) 22:00, 21 April 2013 (UTC)