Help desk
< May 4	<< Apr \| May \| Jun >>	May 6 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

May 5

We need bibles in thai for evangelism, urgent

we need bibles in Thai for evangelism, urgente for bring person from Thailand to Jesus — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.3.194 (talk) 06:57, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What if they want to stay in Thailand? joe•roe^t•c 20:19, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am that I Siam? 66.102.83.61 (talk) 16:43, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

lol! On a more serious note: I'm afraid we can't help you. Wikipedia's policy on neutrality forbids us to assist you in the conversion of Buddhists to Christians... as does the policy on common sense! Pol430 talk to me 23:15, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/D' Anton Lynn

Is this good to go through? 71.180.203.153 (talk) 20:01, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I don't understand American football well enough (I don't understand it at all to be honest), but how can someone be signed to the New York Jets and remain 'undrafted'? Pol430 talk to me 23:17, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Donald Scavarda ONCE Composer

The other ONCE Composers have a separate articles in Wikipedia. You will find separate articles on ONCE Composers Gordon Mumma, Roger Reynolds and Robert Ashley. The only major ONCE Composer without a separate article focusing on his work his Donald Scavarda. I believe that Donald Scavarda deserves his own listing just as the other composers.

I would like to request to have someone re-consider this matter. The other ONCE composers are very supportive of the idea that Donald Scavarda have an entry in Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mchard12 (talk • contribs) 22:18, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What the ONCE composers want is largely irrelevant, wether this submission complies with policy is expressly relevant. I can't make an accurate assessment of the subject's notability because the references are all over the place. See WP:REFB for help with references. This notwithstanding, the submission is not written from a neutral point of view. If you reformat the references properly and fundamentally re-write the submission to comply with the policy on neutrality, then it may be accepted. Pol430 talk to me 23:36, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]