Here, articles are scrutinised by the Alternative music WikiProject editors for factual accuracy and style. Articles are still submitted at Wikipedia:Peer review, but placing them here is likely to ensure a greater and more detailed response from knowledgable editors.
WikiProject peer reviews
A Wikipedia Peer Review can be a useful way to improve articles associated with this WikiProject.
You can keep track of new reviews by watching this page; do that by clicking here. If your project has article alerts enabled, reviews will display on that list too.
To list your review below:
Create the peer review following instructions here.
Add [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Name of nominated article/archiveN]] - November 2024 at the top of the list of requests below (where N is the archive number).
When the review is finished:
Follow the general instructions for peer reviews here.
Move [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Name of nominated article/archiveN]] - MONTH - YEAR from the list of active reviews to the list of old reviews.
To change how your project's peer reviews are managed, see here.
I'd like this article to reach good article status. His new CD is to be released internationally and there is a pretty firm belief that Neversink will reach notability outside of South Africa when it happens. So we should have a good article on him...
N.B. I hope I'm doing this the right way?! I wanted to post on the prose review page but was redirected to this one. Sorry... is there a wrong link or is prose and peer the same??
I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like some suggestions on how to improve it, as I've read it over and it reads quite well to me. I'm not the most well-versed in the topic area, so as someone with limited knowledge of the band, I understood the article quite well. That being said, any suggestions for improving it would be fantastic! Thanks! Yaminatortalk23:49, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
