Wikipedia:Votes for Highlight/summary
The following is a proposed Wikipedia policy, guideline, or process. The proposal may still be in development, under discussion, or in the process of gathering consensus for adoption. |
- Vote for an article you find excellent.
- Previous featured articles can be found in the VFH archive.
- Voters: be constructive with criticism. Writers: Be open to criticism.
- Articles from all namespaces (including Main, Wikipedia, Category, Book, etc.) are eligible for VFH.
- If a nomination disappears from this page, it is likely to be found in either the recently featured or recently failed nomination lists.
- If your article doesn't get featured, don't despair. It may be eligible to be a Good Article so long as it meets certain criteria.
Overview
[edit]VFH is the place to nominate pages for featured or good article status.
The Score is a bad indicator if your article will pass VFH, rather the content in the VFH is what counts. (The score is still looked at to pass or fail the VFH, a VFH won't do well with -5 score but great content)
The feature queue holds passed VFH's for future features.
VFH's on hold will be marked as so. A VFH hold mark looks like this: This VFH is on Hold
Votes
[edit]Support - Support vote. Add 1 to score.
Oppose - Oppose vote. Subtract 1 from score.
Abstain - Withdraws your vote. Does nothing to score.
Conditional Support - Counts as 1 for GA, 0 for A-Class or FA. Adds (1) to score.
Comments
[edit]Comments do not withdraw your vote.
Comment - Make a neutral comment.
WTF? - Ask "WTF is this doing on VFH?".
Important - Make an important comment about the VFH (e.g. if it's POV, AfD content, or a hoax)
Delete - Vote to delete the VFH. (deleted VFH's will not be archived)