Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Wrigley Square

Reason: This shows the casual relaxation area in Millennium Park being used pretty much as intended. I am contemplating cropping to landscape to cover up lower quality portions of the image at the top.
Articles this image appears in: Wrigley Square
Millennium Park
Creator: User:TonyTheTiger

Support as nominator --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:20, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support original, not a bad photo and of a famous park. --I'ḏ♥One 00:52, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- ~~Personally I think the crop is better. However, that cropped photo is not on the article (criterion 1). I oppose. Edge3 (talk) 03:53, 11 September 2010 (UTC)~~[reply]
  - That is not a valid oppose. You can't have both versions in the article. If this passes the crop would replace the original.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:03, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - I'm kinda new here, so I may have interpreted the criteria incorrectly. If the rest of the reviewers have a different opinion, then I'll reconsider. I'm putting this nom on my watchlist right now. Edge3 (talk) 19:34, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      - Opposition withdrawn. Edge3 (talk) 04:44, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support Original I like the original better Spongie555 (talk) 03:53, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Babybambam (talk) 03:33, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:20080602 Wrigley Square.JPG --Spongie555 (talk) 04:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Votes seem to go to the original beacuse none specify for the crop so im guessing they picked the original. Spongie555 (talk) 04:12, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]