Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates/Obama-Springsteen Rally in Cleveland

Obama-Springsteen Rally in Cleveland

Reason: This is a high EV image. I am partial to this photo because of the supporters spelling his name out.
Articles this image appears in: Barack Obama presidential campaign, 2008
United States presidential election, 2008
Obama logo
Inauguration of Barack Obama
Creator: TonyTheTiger

Support as nominator --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:52, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
~~Conditional~~ Support It's a great photograph, congrats for taking it. But I oppose so long as it is in Inauguration of Barack Obama, where it clearly does not belong. Remove it from that article and consider this a support. Obama logo might also be dubious, since it's mostly obscured in the photograph too. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 04:57, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The image was requested during the FAC if I recall correctly.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:02, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - I don't see where it was even discussed in the review... can you point it out to me? It was clearly there when it was promoted though, but I just don't see how it relates to the article. It's, I think, supposed to illustrate the Context section, which discusses campaign slogans, I would think an image like File:Hartfordobama.jpg that more prominently displays the slogan would be more relevant. But thats my opinion. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 07:33, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - I'll run through the discussion in the morning although it could have been one of the PRs.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 08:01, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      - here is the issue that resulted in that section being added. I guess I chose to add the picture myself. I am not sure the section is relevant at all, but it was requested at FAC and I thought the picture went with the section. The picture can be removed if you think it is irrelevant, but most sections in the article about this highly photographed modern event have images.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:32, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
        No offense to your image which is great for illustrating a political ralley, I think File:Hartfordobama.jpg would be better to illustrate the use of the slogan? I'm leaning more to replacing your image on Inauguration of Barack Obama to File:Hartfordobama.jpg since the section it's in discusses mostly the campaign slogans. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 15:44, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - I think the point was to show him as a symbol of change with the "Change We Need" sign clearly visible.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:08, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - If it's for the Change We Need slogan then it would work fine, if it's for the round logo thing, then theres probably better that illustrate that. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 07:33, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

tineye says it's being used here and has no credit given to you, fyi. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 05:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is the protocol for this problem?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:09, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, i know wikia is a fairly HUGE website, so they probably do have methods for handling copyright violations. Alternatively, if you can, you could just edit that file's page and put the attribution tag in. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 07:33, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. that prompted me to add it to our United States presidential election, 2008 article.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:14, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's an acceptable use of the image, I think, quite relevant. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 07:33, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Jujutacular ^talk 13:42, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]