New subsection, WP:TITLE#Name changes, expanding on a sentence above this subsection: "Sometimes, the subject of an article will undergo a change of name. When this occurs, COMMONNAME still applies, but we give extra weight to sources written after the name change is announced. If the sources written after the change is announced routinely use the "new" name, Wikipedia should follow suit and change relevant titles to match. If, on the other hand, sources written after the name change is announced continue to use the "old" name, Wikipedia should continue to do so as well, per WP:COMMONNAME."
In WP:V#Responsibility for providing citations, added: [Whether and how quickly material should be initially removed for not having] "an inline citation to" [a reliable source depends on the material]
In WP:TITLE#Special characters, added: "Similarly various apostrophe(-like) variants (’ʻ ʾ ʿ ᾿ ῾ ‘ ’ c), should generally not be used in page titles. A common exception is the apostrophe character (') itself (e.g. Anthony d'Offay), which should, however, be used sparingly (e.g. Quran instead of Qur'an). If, exceptionally, other variants are used a redirect with the apostrophe variant should be created (e.g. 'Abdu'l-Bahá redirects to `Abdu'l-Bahá)."
In WP:NOR#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources, added: "A source may be considered primary for one topic but secondary for a different one, and sources can contain both primary and secondary source material for the same topic."
In WP:V#Quoting non-English sources, removed: [When quoting a non-English source (whether in the main text, or in a footnote] "or on the talk page", [a translation into English should always accompany the quote.]
In WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a directory, added: "Simple listings without context information. Examples include, but are not limited to: listings of business alliances, clients, competitors, employees (except CEOs, supervisory directors and similar top functionaries), equipment, estates, offices, products and services, sponsors, subdivisions and tourist attractions. Information about relevant single entries with encyclopedic information should be added as sourced prose. Lists of creative works in a wider context are permitted."
In WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, added: [Certain scientific extrapolations are considered to be encyclopedic, such as chemical elements documented by IUPAC before isolation in the laboratory,] "provided that scientists have made significant non-trivial predictions of their properties."
