This nomination predates the introduction in April 2014 of article-specific subpages for nominations and has been created from the edit history of Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests.
This is the archived discussion of the TFAR nomination for the article below. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests). Please do not modify this page.
2 points (2+ years FA). Partly in response to Bencherlite's appeal for noms a little while ago, but also a personal favourite of mine. It's his search-and-rescue work and post-war career as a diplomat, as much as his achievements as a military pilot, that I think makes him an interesting subject. Plus one reviewer was kind enough to remark on the good choice of photos in the article. Originally proposed this for 27 April, the day he reached (on foot, mind) the crash site of a plane lost in the desert; it was then briefly considered for Anzac Day (25 April) but I'm more than happy to see Military history of Australia during World War II running that day (see hatted discussion below). Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 22:26, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Date discussion
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Well on 25 April 1929 he was in the middle of his overland trek to the crash site of those lost airmen, so the date's still relevant to him as well as to Australian service people in general; I have no problem with moving it forward if no-one has anything more appropriate for Anzac Day, and that should definitely qualify for another point... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 06:32, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'd support that - the article has been a FA for almost four years, remains in good shape and is a good match for the date. There would be nothing wrong with using the Eaton article for the TFA on Anzac Day though. Nick-D (talk) 08:50, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well I'm happy to re-position Eaton among the non-date-specific entries and support Nick's article for Anzac Day. Nick, why don't you nom for April 25 and Ill move the Eaton blurb to a non-specific slot? Bench, minor process query, when moving should we leave the commentary above or just make it like a fresh nom? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:01, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note I'm happy to run this soon, I'll just wait a little while after Anzac Day to avoid any perception of an Aussie military domination of the main page. BencherliteTalk16:22, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]