Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 July 16
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 23:41, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
jlwoodwa (talk) 21:53, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- What is the issue with this template? Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 22:01, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- I think this part of WP:TG might apply:
Templates should not normally be used to store article text, as this makes it more difficult to edit the content.
jlwoodwa (talk) 22:13, 16 July 2023 (UTC)- But it's a citation template. These are widely used (e.g., {{cite iucn}}, {{Grove1900}}). Speedy keep. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 13:08, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- I think this part of WP:TG might apply:
- Keep. Long precedent that citation templates don't offend WP:TG; see Category:Specific-source templates and sub-categories. References aren't really part of the article text either. Mackensen (talk) 01:59, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid deletion reason has been supplied. This is a normal book citation template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 03:50, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Unused template, but only a single link included in this subject. 112.204.223.12 (talk) 21:50, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Unneeded navbox. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 22:04, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:50, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:41, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- Template:Initials (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Module:Initials (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
This is a classic example of a template that serves to add a layer of complexity to something for no apparent benefit. Do we really need funky formatting of initials, and if so do we really need a template to do it? * Pppery * it has begun... 16:54, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete due to error messages regarding citations in H. G. Wells. Achmad Rachmani (talk) 17:06, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Could you clarify what the issue is? jlwoodwa (talk) 17:48, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Apostrophe markups, bad parameter links, and wikilinks in URL. Achmad Rachmani (talk) 07:45, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- Could you clarify what the issue is? jlwoodwa (talk) 17:48, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Also the hair space is not aligned with MOS:INITIALS policy. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 21:41, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- WP:TFD#REASONS:
Templates should not be nominated if the issue can be fixed by normal editing. Instead, you should edit the template to fix its problems.
jlwoodwa (talk) 22:12, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- WP:TFD#REASONS:
- Delete {{per nom}}. Completely unnecessary, and actually makes it harder to create initials{{period}} We don't need {{templates}} for every little thing. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 22:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: The precise formatting is up for debate, but even MOS:INITIALS recommends "funky formatting". The benefit of writing
{{init|JRR|Tolkien}}
instead ofJ. R. R. Tolkien
seems obvious. jlwoodwa (talk) 22:12, 16 July 2023 (UTC) - Comment to the closer: If this template is deleted, it should probably not be substed as-is, since that would leave hairspaces in articles, contrary to MOS:INITIALS. The module may need to be adjusted before substing, or articles may need to be reverted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:13, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
- ... or the template shouldn't use hairspaces. Izno (talk) 19:01, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- delete after replacing with MOS:INITIALS compliant wikitext. Frietjes (talk) 16:18, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:12, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
This template is a combination and fork of Template:Infobox comics character and Template:Infobox comic book title. This means that any changes to one of those templates requires to also change this template (if consistency is wanted). Instead what should be done is allowing Template:Infobox comics character to embed Template:Infobox comic book title. This proposal is to replace usages with Infobox comics character embeding Infobox comic book title. Gonnym (talk) 05:18, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Support per nom. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 16:15, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:32, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Strong support. The most efficient possible action. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 06:37, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:11, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- Template:ÖPNV Salzburg (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Last few transclusions were replaced with direct module calls. Now unused. Gonnym (talk) 04:31, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. It had no uses outside of the Salzburg S-Bahn. Mackensen (talk) 15:01, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:32, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2023 July 23. Izno (talk) 21:17, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).