Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 April 20

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1rr With General/Contentious Topic Sanctions

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Barely used and no longer needed. I can only find uses in the double digits for all three templates. In any case, the reason these templates are no longer needed has to do with the community and contentious topics alerting process. These templates do not suffice to meet the awareness criteria in any of these cases. Also, a notice of the article being under 1rr is present in the editnotice and on the talk page. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 20:32, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To add on, these templates appear to predate the GS, DS, and CT procedures that have been developed over time. Now that this works well, there is no need to have any of these. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 20:39, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

2020 Summer Paralympics football 5-a-side templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:06, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

current convention for Olympics and Paralympics is to place these in the main article and transclude using WP:LST. Frietjes (talk) 19:47, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions (except in one editor's table of templates), documentation, incoming links from discussions, or categories. Duplicates existing standard warning templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:39, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:27, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in 2008. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:35, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Created in July 2022. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:32, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:06, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One link, and everything is redlinks that will never be created- it is not standard to create articles for random sections of a cricket season like this template would require Joseph2302 (talk) 11:00, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 06:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. 2.4 Metre World Championship uses the table directly. Gonnym (talk) 06:42, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 06:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Were subst into articles last month. Gonnym (talk) 06:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).