Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 April 16

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< April 15
April 17 >

April 16

[edit]

Template:MLABIOBOT

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unnecessary plain text template --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:21, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:44, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not complex enough to warrant a template. Even manually adding a references section is not hard. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:24, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Pppery, Manually adding it every time is tedious and time taking, which is why this template was created to make it easier. The template has a clear purpose and is being used. No purpose is being served by deleting it and making volunteers spend more time doing something manually, if it can be done with this small template. Venkat TL (talk) 06:57, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:58, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The supposed use case for this doesn't make any sense. The doc page says "replace ==References== with {{subst:foo}}{{subst:MLABIOBOT}}". You replace the references header with a substitution of a template that turns into a references header? Why not just add the new template before the header? 192.76.8.81 (talk) 20:15, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete doesn't make sense. The template name certainly doesn't make sense. And why wouldn't it not also include {{reflist}} if it is to be boilerplate. And the "main" template {{MLABIO}} also doesn't make any sense. "Hoshiarpur" is not a default Legislative Assembly for the entire world. Nor is 2023 the default year of elections for all of history. -- 64.229.90.172 (talk) 17:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Newton—North Delta federal election

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:05, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, redundant to what's available at Newton—North Delta#Members of Parliament --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:43, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:24, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. This is not redundant with what's in the electoral district article — the point of an election results template is to transclude it in both the electoral district's article and the biographical articles about the candidates named in the template, so that the presentation and the numbers are kept consistent across all related articles and can't be vandalized so that one article displays different results from the others. So each of these is used in two or three articles, not just one. Bearcat (talk) 20:57, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Bearcat, it can also be transcluded from the page itself when there is a clear main article. CRwikiCA talk 13:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2023 IL East standings

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 13:33, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading template created solely for use on a draft. This just copies the existing {{2023 AL East standings}}, switching out only the first team in the list for a minor-league team in the International League (but not changing its stats from those of the top team in the other template) and otherwise leaving the rest of the AL template's list intact with MLB teams in the American League, and thus isn't an accurate representation of anything. Even if a template like this is warranted for the International League (which, again, is a minor-league farm team system), it can't use the "MLB standings" wrapper as it isn't MLB -- and furthermore, the creator also tried to create a duplicate template for the IL East at {{2023 International League East standings}} which had to be deleted as entirely non-functional, as it tried to replace the "MLB standings" header with an "MiLB standings" header that doesn't even exist, meaning the template was literally just a non-functional redlink rather than a table of sports league standings.
Templates like this should only ever be created by people who actually know what they're doing, so that they're not leaving a trail of broken and inaccurate templates behind them. Bearcat (talk) 13:30, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This was a stopped work in progress. That was my fault. I had meant to do more, but got confused and started editing the AL East standings page, not noticing it was the wrong page, and never got back to the International League page. Mozart12345678910 (talk) 18:07, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This should be better Mozart12345678910 (talk) 18:17, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Duck fake

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:34, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SPI template created by an editor who is not an SPI clerk or admin. Since its creation in October 2022, it has never been used at SPI, and I can't think of a situation in which I'd use it (the usage notes don't really make sense to me). Apparently this is used at zhwiki, but I don't think it is useful for enwiki SPI. Spicy (talk) 00:25, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, but while we're talking inline icon templates, does anyone know what the point of {{Scissors}} is? casualdejekyll 16:47, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2023_April_16&oldid=1151349060"