Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 October 22
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:44, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Template:2015–16 La Liga table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:2016–17 La Liga table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:2017–18 La Liga table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:2018–19 La Liga table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:2020–21 La Liga table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Templates no longer needed. May be merged into their main articles. Sakiv (talk) 21:33, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 19:34, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Subst and delete - they are transcluded, but now that seasons are over they will not change. GiantSnowman 19:35, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Subst per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:39, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- delete, now merged, WP:LST works here. Frietjes (talk) 17:14, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 October 29. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:47, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:49, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
No transclusions, documentation, incoming links, or categories. Presumably there is a similar template that does this job. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:38, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:39, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Two links. Fails NENAN. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:40, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
- I don't why it's up for deletion but I understand if it needs to be done. Sinkers009 (talk) 23:51, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:03, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:16, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 01:00, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Just a link to the Bangladesh article and the flag icon. Used only one article. Not sure what this is to accomplish. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:45, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:03, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- Delete without substing This is a flag template masquerading as a navbox with no useful content. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:16, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:59, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Created to link to the Carla Amtmann article in infoboxes. Only eight uses as of now. Not a good use of template space just to link an article in infoboxes. Substitute all uses. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:52, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 02:03, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
- Subst and delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:16, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).