Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 May 25

< May 24	May 26 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:49, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Rich List (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Even if the NZ version survives PROD, this would still fail WP:NENAN Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:28, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:17, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:U.S. tabloid television shows

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:41, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:U.S. tabloid television shows (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

WP:NENAN. Most of these don't have articles Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:19, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The articles do exist. Not sure what the nominator is referring to when using NENAN. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Downwards-arrow and Template:Upwards-arrow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:43, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Downwards-arrow (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Upwards-arrow (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template for one character. CharInsert, the 2010 toolbar, or simple copy-paste would do. Nardog (talk) 18:15, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How about Template:Left-arrow and Template:Right-arrow? ɟʎ̝ (talk) 12:06, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{Nand}} and {{Nor-}} generate the same symbol, but they were updated to use math markup rather than plain characters years ago. 163.1.15.238 (talk) 15:24, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:37, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:48, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2022 Yasar Dogu Tournament

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 10:47, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2022 Yasar Dogu Tournament (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No links. All were deleted in two Afd's for the men's and women's on May 11. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:55, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:47, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Infobox Deutsche Tourenwagen Masters round report

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete the "Infobox Formula Regional European Championship race report" template, and no consensus for the DTM template. Please feel free to relist the "Infobox Deutsche Tourenwagen Masters round report" at any point in time for further discussion. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:45, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Deutsche Tourenwagen Masters round report (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Infobox Formula Regional European Championship race report (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. The need for this appears to be met by more generalized templates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:00, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There's a on going discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Motorsport#Infobox for endurance and other races. Per this discussion at list the DTM template will be used to replace the one in used. The other one might be the solution for the other issues listed. I would postpone till the conclusion of the discussion, and check again a possible deletion.Rpo.castro (talk) 11:17, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:37, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Keep the DTM template as I will be switiching a number of DTM articles over to that when I get some time. There does not appear to be any need for the Formula Regional template. – Ky ta bu 02:17, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Inconsistent Birthday

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Feel free to have it restored if the bot is approved. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:47, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Inconsistent Birthday (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions, except in three mostly identical discussions in February 2019 asking about these birthdays. It is unclear why someone created a template to ask this question. Subst and delete and move on. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Was used by WikiLoop Bot to nominate inconsistent birthdates between language of Wikipedia. Chances are they are all cleaned up so far. Could we keep it for future use? xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 16:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where was it used? Is the bot still active? Please link to relevant pages so that editors can evaluate these statements. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:32, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If the bot in question is Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Xinbenlv bot, then it was never approved. If that is the case, then the template should be deleted. Gonnym (talk) 20:21, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 19:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Asan Mugunghwa FC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Asan Mugunghwa FC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Defunct club. Only to links to articles. The stadiums for the team. Two categories and one link to a section on the main article. No navigation. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. Giant Snowman 10:38, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Giant Snowman 10:40, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Asan Mugunghwa FC squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:51, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Asan Mugunghwa FC squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox for defunct football/soccer team. Was emptied back in April 2022. No need for this anymore. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. Giant Snowman 10:38, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Giant Snowman 10:40, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SIR north

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 10:45, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SIR north (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:SIR south (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:SIR transfer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused Staten Island Railway templates. Probably replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/Staten Island Railway. Gonnym (talk) 06:54, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per nom – Epicgenius (talk) 23:49, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:HurricaneActiveExperimental

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. ✗plicit 10:46, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:HurricaneActiveExperimental (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No transclusions. Proposed in 2006 but not adopted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 05:10, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Is country an EU member state and three similar templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 June 1. ✗plicit 10:46, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Is_country_an_EU_member_state (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Is_valid_full_month_name (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Is_valid_month_name (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Is_valid_short_month_name (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jesse Ventura

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 June 1. ✗plicit 10:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jesse_Ventura (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Diplomatic missions of the United Kingdom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 June 1. ✗plicit 10:48, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Diplomatic_missions_of_the_United_Kingdom (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Foreign_relations_of_the_United_Kingdom (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).