Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 May 11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:43, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per discussion at WP:ENB#Template:Course wizard and Template:Course page, these and their subpages are not currently used and have not been used for some time in lieu of an offwiki dashboard. No comment on whether they should be substed or not. I'd personally prefer not. Izno (talk) 21:32, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:41, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. Appears to have been replaced in all relevant articles by Module:Sports color/volleyball. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:07, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:10, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. All relevant articles have been updated to use Module:Adjacent stations/Philippine National Railways. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:42, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 01:03, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Has only four links to the subject. The group, Seo Min-woo, and Andy Lee. The three media company article links have little connection to the group. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:31, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:10, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This is a first batch of 60 (out of about 180) S-line templates that have been replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/KSR. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:26, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:10, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/TER Normandie. Gonnym (talk) 10:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 12:45, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Shosholoza Meyl. Gonnym (talk) 10:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Indian rail templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 14:09, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Chennai MRTS, Module:Adjacent stations/Chennai Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Chennai Suburban, Module:Adjacent stations/Jaipur Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Kochi Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Kolkata Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Nagpur Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Namma Metro, Module:Adjacent stations/Pune Metro. Gonnym (talk) 09:49, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2022 May 18. plicit 08:32, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 08:31, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions. This documentation page's parent template uses {{WPBannerMeta/subtemplatedoc}} as a shared documentation template, so this subpage is not usable. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:02, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly don't remember what I made this template for. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:31, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 08:31, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions of this navbox, which is trying to do what Category:Bengali-language magazines more properly does. This navbox is not needed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:58, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 01:53, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this message is wanted, its text should be added to Template:Reliable sources for medical articles. No reason to have two talk page banners for the same thing. Gonnym (talk) 18:36, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 03:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 01:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This template was only used 3 times since it was created. We should in standardize on one template and not have numerous of these templates. The advantage to this is that editors can focus on improving the text and visibility of these, like what has been done with Template:Welcome-anon. Gonnym (talk) 18:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 03:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).