Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 August 11
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:07, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
A map of Mexico's subdivision accompanied with a list below. This is purely article content on template space. Not needed as List of states of Mexico already does the job this template intends to do. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:18, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Can we replace the all-blue map on List of states of Mexico with the multi-coloured map in this template? I support deleting the table though. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 05:14, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- That map comes from Template:Mexico labeled map, which is not being nominated here. Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:53, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete now that the replacement of the state map has been dealt with. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:35, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- delete, I agree the multi-coloured map is better (now replaced in the articles). Frietjes (talk) 18:37, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The map used here on this template is a bit clearer and better. But the template still has no bearing in staying. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:12, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
One link and one redirect. Fails navigation. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:13, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:53, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
- Template:Insignia of UK/CDT/GVCAC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Insignia of UK/CDT/VCC/RM (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:05, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete both per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:53, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete as a test template. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 21:54, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- Template:Sandbox/Gramme (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
no longer functional, and only used on one talk page Frietjes (talk) 16:09, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:53, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 21:53, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
only redlinks + 1 bit of grey text Dutchy45 (talk) 15:17, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:53, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page discussions. GiantSnowman 18:50, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 18:52, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete only redlinks in the template, and none of them look notable enough to be created anyway. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:06, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 13:39, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
- Template:Heads of government of monarchies (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Heads of government of republics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Contravenes all 5 principles of Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates#Navigation templates: this is not a coherent topic, in that reliable sources do not usually group these people into a category; the subject of the template is not mentioned in the articles; the articles do not frequently refer to each other; there is no article on the topic (nor should there be); and editors would not usually link these topics in a see also section. DrKay (talk) 13:31, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- I really do not think it will work, please delete per request as soon as possible. I only created these templates as a sort of an experiment to see if the template is useful or not because if there are templates dedicated to monarchs, why not make one for heads of government of monarchies. I was going to ask an admin to delete in the first place since it may not work. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 14:37, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The template creator asked me on my talk page to delete these three templates, but unfortunately I can't, since I am not an administrator and the three templates are ineligible for G7 speedy deletion due to other people contributing to it. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 18:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:53, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).