Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 July 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose substituting the templates where it's used as is the standard for articles about the U.S. Senate elections. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:51, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose substituting the templates where it's used as is the standard for articles about the U.S. House of Representatives elections. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:47, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose substituting the template where it's used as no election templates have been created for other Northern Mariana Island election articles. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:43, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For the American Presidential results, we don't use the standard table format, as there are two recognized candidates. Third-party candidates aren't recognized as legitimate candidates as they only get few votes in comparison to both the Republican and Democratic candidates. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:39, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting my answer as each requires a different rational:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So far, only two templates exist for the PR Senate results. They haven't been created for any election prior to 2004 and after 2008. Propose substituting the tables onto the articles where these are used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:33, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Number 57 should the table at Template:Puerto Rico Senate election, 2004 replace the table at 2004 Puerto Rican general election#Senate? Gonnym (talk) 09:27, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Gonnym: I would say so as the ones in the article are really lacking in detail and are a format I've never seen before. Subst and delete for me. Cheers, Number 57 10:06, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete to the election articles. Section transclude (if wanted) to the Senate articles. Gonnym (talk) 10:12, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mexican Election Templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose substituting wherever these are used, but generally, these are unused en masse because the respective mainspace election articles use different tables for the election results. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:19, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

El Salvadoran Election Templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused and the election articles use different tables with accurate information. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:43, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Nicaraguan Election Templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused and the election articles use different tables with accurate information. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:43, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused and the election articles use different tables with accurate information. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:43, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • @Gonnym: There isn't really a 'correct' version as such, but the ones in the article are more detailed. I'm happy that these templates can be deleted; I was planning on cleaning up the Panamanian election series in the near future anyway. Number 57 10:01, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused and the election articles use different tables with accurate information. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:43, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Articles use different tables. The 2006 templates are used on a userpage for a user which hasn't edited in 9 years. No need to subst as the data used on the article is different. Gonnym (talk) 09:35, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused and the election articles uses different tables with accurate information. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:25, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Honduras Elections Templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All remain unused and the mainspaces use a different table with accurate information. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:21, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and the mainspaces uses a different table for the results. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:10, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mainspace uses an accurate table for the results. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:05, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused as the respective articles use different tables for the election results. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:26, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused as the respective articles use different tables for the election results. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:23, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All unused as the respective articles use different tables for the election results. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:23, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both templates are pointless as the respective articles use a different table for the election results. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:23, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hamburg-Köln-Express templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:49, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{s-line}} data modules for the defunct Hamburg-Köln-Express. I removed two article-space transclusions; the successor Flixtrain templates were already there. Mackensen (talk) 17:33, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:49, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused at Departments of Bolivia, which uses a standard map. Gonnym (talk) 09:18, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 14:47, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. The page given as an example of one using it, List of California birds, has not been using it since 2014. Gonnym (talk) 09:17, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 17:13, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

unnecessary per WP:NAVBOX, many red wikilinks, many mosques in mention may not be notable per WP:NBUILDING to warrant individual articles (but nevertheless relevant as a redirect and to include in respective settlements it is located e.g. Kampong Bunut Mosque redirected to Kampong Bunut#Mosque Zulfadli51 (talk) 06:33, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My opinion is we can remove all of the red links and also all of the redirected links. Besides, red links should not be used in navigation box per WP:REDNOT and the redirected link also not important if we dont have the link linking directly to the mosque. While I may not favor the deletion of this template, I prefer the full trimming of the red & redirect links. Chongkian (talk) 06:51, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).