Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 July 22

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:12, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and unnecessary as the 1932–33 La Liga season article uses a different table with the same information. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:05, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

MBTA Blue Line templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:08, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Depreciated and long unused. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:43, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:06, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The template is a simple table used only on one page. Should be subst and deleted. Gonnym (talk) 20:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:06, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for only two albums which already link to one another as well as to the main article. Provides no additional aid in navigation. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 18:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:05, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not needed, as almost none of the links relate directly to the team, but are just links to competitions (which are already in Template:Netball Superleague). For this template to be useful, you would want season articles about the team e.g. in Template:Team Bath (netball), but right now, the Surrey Storm isn't linking between articles about the Storm, so should be deleted. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:03, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a template for a defunct WikiProject, Wikipedia:WikiProject Rodeo/Bull riding is literally a blank page, no articles were assessed and this template serves no function.

In the future should pages like this be speedied as an uncontroversial deletion or does it warrant discussion? Liz Read! Talk! 05:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused and even if it were, it serves no purpose as the project is defunct and is blank. Gonnym (talk) 17:16, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 13:35, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Very unnecessary as the results article is already listed in the Suriname NFT template. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 04:56, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 12:39, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).