Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 February 19

< February 18	February 20 >

February 19

Template:Infobox bilibili personality

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox bilibili personality (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. If this data is necessary it should be a part of Template:Infobox YouTube personality or some renamed merger of the two. Izno (talk) 22:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unused. Nigej (talk) 18:50, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unused. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Television Star

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:TV Star. Selecting the merge target as the older of the two. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:11, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Television Star (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:TV Star (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Television Star with Template:TV Star.
We wound up with two of these, and it's probably time to remove the "TV" one as not as coherent as "television". There are no unsubsted transclusions, so closing would be as simple as changing links in one or two directories. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 22:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per nom. Take your pick regarding the name. Nigej (talk) 18:51, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge not meaningfully different. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bhamo Township

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 February 27. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bhamo_Township (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Banmauk Township

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 February 27. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:12, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Banmauk_Township (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Zalun Township

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:14, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Zalun Township (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Zigon Township (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Buthidaung Township (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Budalin Township (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Bokpyin Township (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Bogale Township (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Bilin Township (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Bawlakhe Township (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Bago Township (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Ayadaw Township (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Aunglan Township (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Ann Township (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Amarapura Township (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

List of red links with no reasonable chance of ever becoming an article. Bot created. Why the whole category can not be deleted is a mystery to me, so I follow the advice of Plasticpork and nominate them separately. The Banner talk 17:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Mahlaing TfD. This comment applies to all nominated Myanmar township templates except the improved Hkamti Township. (Don't eat the plastic pork!) Certes (talk) 17:50, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'll also exclude Banmauk and Bhamo from my Delete !vote, with thanks to Pppery for doing the research. Certes (talk) 16:40, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. No help for navigation. Nigej (talk) 13:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:The Bold Barnstar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 12:02, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The Bold Barnstar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

originally nominated for speedy deletion by @Elizium23 with the reason "The_Bold_Barnstar.gif was deleted" FASTILY 20:07, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Indeed the gif went 10 years ago and now it is purely text: "The Bold Barnstar". I'm not a fan of barnstars but it doesn't seem much of a reason to delete. Nigej (talk) 21:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unused, without realistic chance of ever seeing use. --Paul_012 (talk) 17:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's "unused" because it's subst-only. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I did a quick insource search for "The Bold Barnstar" in "user" and "user talk" space and found 2 uses, one from 2010 (User:Bovineboy2008/Awards) and one from this month (User talk:Elizium23). Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:35, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed, I'd be happy to see it deleted on the basis that it's surplus to requirement. Nigej (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Plastikspork. --Izno (talk) 02:26, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Template:The Original Barnstar or Template:What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar. I feel that any award given should not be rescinded without a good reason, which is why I recommend replacements where needed for the two awardees. Redirecting this template also opens the door for possible future use. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:25, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TL Services trains

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TL Services trains (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Izno (talk) 05:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Iraq War Coalition troop deployment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2021 February 27. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Iraq_War_Coalition_troop_deployment (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:TL Services ferries

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TL Services ferries (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Izno (talk) 05:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wikipedia for World Heritage Invitation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wikipedia for World Heritage Invitation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Long over and done. No objection to moving to some relevant some page and substing any remaining uses. Izno (talk) 05:27, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Trains/associated

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:45, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Trains/associated (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused subtemplate. Izno (talk) 05:20, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support deletion - This is a remnant from before the 2009 redesign of the {{WikiProject Trains}} project banner. This is no longer needed. Slambo (Speak) 14:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ludomił Rayski

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after moving content to article Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:47, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ludomił Rayski (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-use template. Izno (talk) 04:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Userpageheader2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Userpageheader2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Izno (talk) 04:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WAAS timeline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after moving content to article Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:49, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WAAS timeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use template. Izno (talk) 04:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Aberdeen opentask

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Aberdeen opentask (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single use template that can be trivially substed. Izno (talk) 04:26, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Old cruft from over a decade ago. I don't think this even needs to be substituted, but I have no objection to doing so. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Aberdeen tasks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Aberdeen tasks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Its only use was trivially replaced in Talk:Aberdeen. Izno (talk) 04:26, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Old cruft from over a decade ago. I don't think this even needs to be substituted, but I have no objection to doing so. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Voltaire timeline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Voltaire timeline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Izno (talk) 04:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - It was used in Voltaire until 16:01, 11 December 2020‎ when it was removed with the comment "Chronology: Removing this block image (detailed timeline), which as far as I can tell, can't be edited." Clearly it can be edited, but no one has added it back into the article. Options are Delete and Subst/Delete back into the Voltaire article where it used to be. Nigej (talk) 18:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I suspect "can't be edited" means "I CBA to figure out how any timeline whatsoever works because timeline is a hot mess of syntax"... which is a reasonably charitable description. --Izno (talk) 19:21, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is why article content shouldn't be stored in (formerly) single-use templates, it results in the accumulation of cruft via natural article editing. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Iloilo City imagemap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:52, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Iloilo City imagemap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is used to hold an image and previously held an excessive table of the population of each district. I've since removed the table because of the excess (and because there was no sane way to have the table and meet the need of WP:MOSCOLLAPSE). Izno (talk) 04:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete Purely static information, hasn't been meaningfully edited since 2015. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:South Dublin County Council polling scheme

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:South Dublin County Council polling scheme (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-use template. Izno (talk) 04:10, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst & delete Single use, static information. No reason to be a template. Nigej (talk) 18:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Rail network in South East Queensland box

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rail network in South East Queensland box (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template used in only one page. Izno (talk) 03:58, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete Insufficient complexity of markup to warrant a template. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:SWC Results/pair

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:49, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SWC Results/pair (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template used in only two pages. Izno (talk) 03:56, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst and delete This template does a lot of complicated switching based on parameters, but in the end it's just a wikitable. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lv-conj-table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after substituting Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:55, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lv-conj-table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Lv-conj-1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Lv-conj-2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Lv-conj-3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template used via 3 separate templates in only 1 page. Delete as a single-use templates. Izno (talk) 03:48, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The -1,-2.-3 templates are called by Latvian grammar#Conjugation classes (the -3 template being called twice). These three then call the -table template. All very complicated unless there is some plan to expand the number of uses. Nigej (talk) 18:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. Subst and delete the lot as single use. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of Alcibiades' life

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:56, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Timeline of Alcibiades' life (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Single-use. Should be merged into the relevant page. Izno (talk) 03:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Subst & delete per nom. Single use, static. Nigej (talk) 17:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete as single-use. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Wikipedia's sister projects (fluid)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:07, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wikipedia's sister projects (fluid) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Wikipedia's sister projects is responsive now, which makes this template entirely superfluous.

Transcluded in a few places, so I think substing, or moving to some primarily user-space subpage seems a reasonable response here if not a full delete. Izno (talk) 01:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see no point in moving this anywhere, since it has now become redundant. Just replace all uses with Template:Wikipedia's sister projects and delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).