Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 September 10

< September 9	September 11 >

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:07, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Module:IsValidPageName (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to Module:Page, see Template:IsValidPageName/sandbox * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:22, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Y Seems OK to me as long as all the pages in Special:WhatLinksHere/Module:IsValidPageName are transitioned over. The module originally came from wikt:Module:isValidPageName, where it has since been deleted. – Minh Nguyễn ^💬 21:26, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've replaced all uses of the module, and will tag it for deletion as {{db-g7}} once the job queue gets around to purging all >100,000 pages. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 21:52, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Mailing list member

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 September 24. Primefac (talk) 22:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Module:Mailing_list_member (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ZHYXCBG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Alexf (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:04, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ZHYXCBG (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Low usage duplicate of {{American politics AE}}. Guessing this was a test in template space, given the name of the template and edit summaries. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 19:35, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete per G2. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1RR consensus required DS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the template's undeletion. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1RR consensus required DS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Duplicate of {{American politics AE}}, like {{Post-1932 American politics discretionary sanctions page restrictions}} was. I would just redirect, but this one has a very generic name for some reason, even though its usage is limited to the AP2 case, thus I think deletion is a better idea since it's misleading. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 19:30, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:ARBIPA

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 September 20. Primefac (talk) 15:39, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ARBIPA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Afc and Template:Afc2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Afc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Afc2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not seeing the usefulness of these templates, considering that the amount of characters are used to type these templates are about the same as the piped link they create. Also, some clubs' articles use "AFC" instead of "A.F.C.", and these templates are set up for only the latter, and trying to add more code to them to do otherwise would require a parameter, increasing the amount of text typed even further, even further reducing these templates' usefulness. Delete both. Steel1943 (talk) 18:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:TemplUtl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Module:TemplUtl (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This module was copied from the German Wikipedia (without even copying the documentation) to support User:PK2/Template:Colour in a way that is redundant to Template:Yesno. Modules should not be copied from other wikis when local modules exist that can do the same thing. Many of the remaining, unused functions are also redundant or not applicable here. For example:

failure is redundant to Template:Error. It does some fancy logic with previews that I don't understand, but there should be one consistent way for templates to show errors, and that is Template:Error on the English Wikipedia.
fake and fakes are simply not applicable on the English Wikipedia, as there is no desire to keep Special:UnusedTemplates clean of templates that are supposed to be unused.
failsafe is meta-content that is only useful if at least one other function is used, so doesn't count.

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:55, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:UCS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Module:UCS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only used in the userspace of the creator, who has been indefinitely blocked. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 17:21, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:RenderProfile

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 September 24. Primefac (talk) 22:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Module:RenderProfile (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Module:Range

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 September 24. Primefac (talk) 22:46, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Module:Range (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Tel Aviv – BenGurion line

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Techie3 (talk) 15:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tel Aviv – BenGurion line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused; superseded by Template:Jerusalem-Herzliya Line. Crash48 (talk) 13:36, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 10:48, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Vb standings

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Techie3 (talk) 15:20, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vb standings (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Module:VB standings Table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and broken. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:36, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).