Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 May 26

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< May 25 May 27 >

May 26

[edit]

Russian futsal club templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:12, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A set of Russian futsal club templates which are just wrappers for simple links. A lot (most maybe) of the links are red links. The templates should be deleted and usages should be replaced with a direct link to the team article. Tagging the other templates in process. Gonnym (talk) 21:32, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:French Revolution left

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:13, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused as those articles use either {{French Revolution}} or {{History of France}}. Gonnym (talk) 21:05, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Football league tree Estonia 2009

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:13, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template. Also it is a very strange way to represent leagues. Gonnym (talk) 21:02, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:21, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Football squad mid2

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:13, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused football template. Gonnym (talk) 21:01, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 10:21, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bus(SG)

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:13, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no doc, not placed on any category, single edit Gonnym (talk) 20:46, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:BusGuide

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:13, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, no doc, not placed on any category, single edit. Gonnym (talk) 20:41, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bs r team

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:14, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused basketball template. Gonnym (talk) 20:39, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bs r header

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:15, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused basketball table header template. Gonnym (talk) 20:39, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Church doctors

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Catholic saints. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Church doctors with Template:Catholic saints.
Clear redundancy. PPEMES (talk) 18:57, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with merge. Oct13 (talk) 17:30, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Department of Fun/templatepage

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:16, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused subpage of a template redirect. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:08, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:DNB crossref

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Author agrees it is deletable — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:53, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template whose only function is to assign a category. The category does not exist. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:01, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Culinary Institute of America alumni box

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:17, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, with invalid content. I think this was some sort of test. All of these people attended Cornell University, not the Culinary Institute of America. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:58, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, delete. I was hoping to create something like Cornell has, but I realized that unfortunately most of the notable alumni of the CIA don't even have freely-licensed photos that could be used here :( ɱ (talk) 15:10, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to smash your dream. It's a nice gallery template; you might stash the code in one of your user pages and then use it directly in the CIA article if you can find some photos. If the content is going to be used in only one article, I don't see a need for a template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:29, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cream of the Crop track listing

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:17, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Content exists at the main article. No reasonable chance of re-use. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:55, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Salem–Vriddhachalam–Cuddalore Port line

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 June 5. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:58, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Taiwan Dramas 2019

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:23, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTTVGUIDE. I could be wrong, but this just looks like a TV guide to me. – Jonesey95 (talk) 10:43, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ancient Chinese political systems

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G7 TheSandDoctor Talk 16:58, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Apparent test of template copy/paste, done in Template space instead of a sandbox. – Jonesey95 (talk) 10:38, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Substitution of Template:Smiley

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Primefac (talk) 14:30, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This section is transcluded from Template talk:Smiley. (edit | history)

Used on talk pages all around the project, ending up in years-old archives, this seems to be a classical example of a template that should automatically be substituted by AnomieBOT. It would be trivial to implement this change by adding the relevant code to the template's documentation subpage, so this is not a classical edit request. I am rather posting this here to see if someone raises an objection in the next, say, 30 days. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:49, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: AnomieBOT refuses to substitute templates with >100 transclusions unless they are added to the template-protected User:AnomieBOT/TemplateSubster force, so this will in fact require a template editor to implement. (I'm neutral on whether this should be substituted.) * Pppery * has returned 04:09, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see, thank you for the clarification. That does seem to be a reasonable safeguard. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:08, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@ToBeFree: It's been over a month. * Pppery * survives 21:52, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, Pppery, I forgot about this, thank you very much. Hmm hmm. In the meantime, at Special:PermanentLink/896892472#Request for creation, I have learned that I may need to be more careful about consistency-justified requests. This one has potential for mass disruption if anything goes wrong, and the benefit is negligible. I abandon this request, but I do not object to it. Any template editor or administrator who sees a need to substitute this template can probably do so, pointing to this discussion but taking the responsibility for the edit themselves. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:37, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Listed at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 May 26. * Pppery * survives 00:38, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Substitution of Template:BOTREQ

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 June 6. Primefac (talk) 14:28, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_May_26&oldid=900587766"