Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 January 11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 11

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:35, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused and basically redundant to the main map. if this is a better map image, we should replace the main one (although the inset in the main map is a nice feature). Frietjes (talk) 16:06, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:32, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused and redundant to using the |AlternativeMap= parameter with the main map. Frietjes (talk) 16:01, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:33, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unnecessary fork of Template:Big Brother endgame (replaced by me in Splitsvilla). if more colours are needed we can add those to Template:Big Brother endgame, but we don't need yet another big brother template. Frietjes (talk) 15:38, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete on author request. Seems like the template creator and principal editor endorses the deletion, so I'll short cut this per WP:CSD#G7 Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:44, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Already correctly removed from template space once, but has been recreated. The same deletion/renaming reason as last time; political userboxes should never exist in the template namespace.  ‑ Iridescent 15:08, 11 January 2019 (UTC)  ‑ Iridescent 15:29, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: I accidentally wrongly created this at MfD not TfD, CoolSkittle's above comment copied across when I moved this discussion. No content changed. ‑ Iridescent 15:31, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh, good grief. I've no opinion whether we leave this here, or move it back to MfD (as a recreation of something that's already been deleted by XfD, it's a straightforward procedural deletion anyway). ‑ Iridescent 15:33, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:37, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

problematic name and only generates redlinks; would be better to make a generic national team flag template to avoid having one of these for every sport and every gender Frietjes (talk) 14:30, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please, Please enter the proposed abrevature name for Sepak takraw, example: Sep, Spktr, Septak, ... ? Bogic (talk) 16:23, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
please provide a link to a national Sepak takraw team page. Frietjes (talk) 17:28, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I agree with Frietjes. Much better to have a single template than ones for every sport. Very confusing to have so many duplicate templates. Templates also only generate redlinks. --Tom (LT) (talk) 00:58, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — JJMC89(T·C) 00:39, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate license tag which appears to permit NC/ND files FASTILY 06:18, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).