Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 December 6

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< December 5 December 7 >

December 6

[edit]

Template:Emerging technologies

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was split. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:34, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template is still incomplete (see Category:Emerging technologies), but it is currently too long (a sort of mess), and does not help in navigation.

Solution: Split the template into child navigable templates on related topics. Störm (talk) 17:36, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:34, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Fourteen Holy Helpers

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:34, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Fourteen Holy Helpers with Template:Catholic saints.
Please see immediately here below. PPEMES (talk) 00:48, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not Sure, is this group notable enough for its own section (probably after 'Virgins' and before 'Related')?, it's already linked in Related so maybe just leaving it as separate templates would be best depending on weight-of-topic. Randy Kryn (talk) 02:15, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, since the designation of a saint as one of the Fourteen Holy Helpers is nothing on par with the saint's designation as 'confessor' or 'virgin' or 'martyr.' It's a title, determined by history, by which a certain group of otherwise unrelated saints are venerated together. It should remain separate. — AJDS talk 05:31, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:26, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Catholic protection

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 December 14. (non-admin closure) — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 17:58, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Monastic glossary

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after merging with Outline of the Catholic Church or another more appropriate article Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:37, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Propose merging Template:Monastic glossary with Outline of the Catholic Church.
Seems like a rather odd way of going about. Better merge with article realm entry Outline of the Catholic Church? PPEMES (talk) 00:14, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. PPEMES (talk) 16:13, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
PPEMES, then you should change what you wrote above. Frietjes (talk) 21:24, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK. I tried to, although not sure it follows the rules to tweak it that way. PPEMES (talk) 21:36, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:25, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AFLLadderLine

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:19, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being replaced by Module:Sports table Frietjes (talk) 18:02, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:AFL Ladder/1897

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:19, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus in prior deletion discussions and at WT:FOOTY. Frietjes (talk) 17:44, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lnep and Template:Lnep/begin

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after changes are made to episode list, assuming there are no objections in the corresponding thread on the talk page Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:42, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is no reason why these template forks cannot exist as the actual templates that they call. -- /Alex/21 14:31, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Wug·a·po·des​ 15:10, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 00:39, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2019_December_6&oldid=1090622071"