Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 January 15

< January 14	January 16 >

January 15

Template:Japan Squad 2014 FIFA World Cup

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:09, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Japan Squad 2014 FIFA World Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused fork of the squad in the squads article Frietjes (talk) 20:28, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

delete unused per the above ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 20:59, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom, no need and out of date. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not needed. Giant Snowman 10:54, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ivorian parliamentary election, 2016

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:09, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ivorian parliamentary election, 2016 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused duplicates the results in the article Frietjes (talk) 20:27, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IskanderMakhmudovIndustries

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:09, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:IskanderMakhmudovIndustries (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused; would be better as a list article if this is accurate and needed Frietjes (talk) 20:25, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:FC Edmonton squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:28, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FC Edmonton squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

the team is defunct Joeykai (talk) 17:06, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No need for a defunct team. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 11:04, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there is no 'current' squad, so no need for such a template. Giant Snowman 10:54, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Alberta Floorball League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:29, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Alberta Floorball League (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

only used in one article Frietjes (talk) 16:40, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I do not see main article. No need to exist. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 10:46, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Palmares start

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Div col. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:33, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Palmares start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose redirecting Template:Palmares start to Template:Div col.
The Palmares start template is a feature-poor wrapper for Template:Div col that uses a deprecated parameter (number of columns) as its only input. It should be redirected to Div col so that people can use that template's additional features, like the colwidth parameter. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:52, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

do not merge, instead redirect it just like you redirected Palmares end. there is really no need for adding a tfm notice to {{div col}}. Frietjes (talk) 16:42, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A redirect is intended. I didn't see that option (I used Twinkle), so I have manually adjusted the text here. I have removed the tfm notice from Div col. I know that I could have boldly redirected it, but I thought I would advertise for a while just in case anyone had objections. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:37, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Have always wanted cols to be depreciated. I tried to implement colwidth into it in 2013 (Template:Palmares start/testcases). Frietjes, I just noticed you removed |source=, was/is it not being used? Also, Wikipedia:WikiProject Cycling/Standard cyclist biography#Major results will need updating. BaldBoris 19:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- BaldBoris, Category:Pages using palmares start with the source parameter was added back in 2014 and has been empty since that same time period. Frietjes (talk) 19:27, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom, this is redundant and inferior to {{div col}}.— TAnthony^Talk 15:32, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Yeproc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:34, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Yeproc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The only connection most of these bands/acts have with each other is this record label. Not a reason for a navbox such as this on all those individual artist's pages. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 20:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template should not be deleted because it makes sense for a smallish record label to have a template for easy navigation of its artists and the the other bands that share the same label on the artist's pages.Also see above.User talk:RythianMage 22:26, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can't people do that easily from Yep Roc Records? What reason would there to be for someone to link to The Soft Boys from Billy Bragg? --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 23:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Main point of Navigation boxes is to make navigating easier, we could all just go to the original pages for all templates and waste time, but these provide people with easy related info that is easily accessible and saves time. 00:10 30 December 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RythianMage (talk • contribs)

They're great when they connect related articles, but two bands who happen to be signed to the same label may only have that in common. We shouldn't be cluttering up articles with these. Look how bad Of Montreal looks with 4 templates linking to other articles unrelated to the band itself. By the way, there is consensus that such use of record label navboxes should be deleted. See

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 28#Record label templates from 5 years ago.
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 November 21#Record label templates revisited from one month ago. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 02:04, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Very well I still protest but seeing as it can cause clutter overuse should be avoided and i guess the only reasonable way is just to delete these types of templates instead of having to go on a case by case basis. 2:10, 30 December 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RythianMage (talk • contribs)

delete per precedent. Frietjes (talk) 17:15, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:35, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nihlus 12:40, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above.— TAnthony^Talk 15:48, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Bnr

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Nihlus 00:34, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bnr (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Acts like the 10,000 Maniacs and Elvis Costello have been associated with numerous labels throughout their careers. You wouldn't want navboxes such as this one created and placed in those articles for each of those labels to link to otherwise unrelated artists. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 20:16, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template should not be deleted because it makes sense for a smallish record label to have a template for easy navigation of its artists and the the other bands that share the same label on the artist's pages, also many record label artists share similar genres and styles which make more case for its relevancy.User talk:RythianMage 22:26, 29 December 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RythianMage (talk • contribs)

delete per prior precedent. Frietjes (talk) 23:30, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:35, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nihlus 12:40, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above.— TAnthony^Talk 15:48, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Mississippi State Bulldogs women's basketball coach navbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep. Withdrawn by nominator, userfying to User:Jweiss11/Template:Mississippi State Bulldogs women's basketball coach navbox. (non-admin closure) Corky 16:00, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Mississippi State Bulldogs women's basketball coach navbox (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Fails WP:EXISTING... only two active links. Corky 01:15, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:10, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).