Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 August 22
August 22
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisted.. Wrong place to list it. Listing it at WP:MFD. (non-admin closure) The Duke of NonsenseWhat is necessary for thee? 19:08, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
I'm all for freedom of speech, but however Wikipedia isn't the place to voice it. I'm requesting deletion per WP:POLEMIC, as this template will only start arguments between users. Thank you. The Duke of NonsenseWhat is necessary for thee? 19:06, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:14, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- Template:PD-NCGov (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
This template purports to claim that works of the North Carolina state government are public domain. I have two points: (1) it's talking about your ability to obtain the records, not the copyright of those records. Saying that you have the right to obtain a document I created doesn't give you any redistribution rights to that document. (2) Amusingly, the template badly mis-quotes the law. The template says, "Therefore, it is the policy of this State that the people may obtain free copies of the State's public records and public information." The law actually says, "Therefore, it is the policy of this State that the people may obtain copies of their public records and public information free or at minimal cost unless otherwise specifically provided by law." B (talk) 15:29, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Copyright status of work by North Carolina is uncertain in general, but some of its works are known to be copyrightable. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:10, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 August 31. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:19, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- Template:Takeru (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 August 31. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 11:20, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).