Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2018 August 15

< August 14	August 16 >

August 15

Template:Miss Portuguesa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 August 23. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:59, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Miss_Portuguesa (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Peak Tram style

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:01, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Peak Tram style (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Peak Tram color (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Peak Tram lines (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Peak Tram stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused; replaced by {{Adjacent stations}}. Data is now in Module:Adjacent stations/Peak Tram. Jc86035 (talk) 10:19, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. Jackdude101 ^talk ^cont 13:48, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:National anthems of Serbia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2018 August 23. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:10, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:National_anthems_of_Serbia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Archdeacons of Scarborough, ON

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:59, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Archdeacons of Scarborough, ON (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navigation template in fact without back link to the subject. It is linking the Anglican Diocese of Toronto, not the archdeaconry of Scarborough as you would expect. The Banner talk 14:00, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think that this is a valid reason under WP:DEL11. The template title link can be changed. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 19:01, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Ow, are you now following me around? The Banner talk 19:09, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Scarborough, Toronto is part of Toronto. Being a large urban diocese it has several archdeaconsBashereyre (talk) 20:12, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
See also Template:Archdeacons of Peterborough, ON, Template:Archdeacons of Perth, ON, Template:Archdeacons of Wentworth, ON, which also have no parent articles. Frietjes (talk) 14:18, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 03:13, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Anarion_family_tree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:58, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Anarion_family_tree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Elendil_family_tree contains all of the information that Template:Anarion_family_tree contains, plus more. Additionally, Template:Anarion_family_tree is not used on any pages. 2601:2C4:C480:946:FC71:F76:5CFA:4ECB (talk) 22:58, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete both Template:Anarion family tree and Template:Elendil family tree.~~ There has been a request for sources on both templates since August 2015. Three years is more than enough time for a reliable source to be found. -- PBS (talk) 13:35, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spent an hour looking it up, and the source is the LOTR appendix A. Elendil family tree is now sourced. You can copy the source to the other one if you want, but I figure it is going to be deleted anyway. 2601:2C4:C480:946:FC71:F76:5CFA:4ECB (talk) 21:47, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep now that there is a source. This is not a paper based encyclopedia, so no reason to delete sourced text in this case. -- PBS (talk) 19:07, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:241:300:c930:f411:792e:dc7f:2644 (talk) 20:38, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
delete, unused. Frietjes (talk) 14:01, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Per my talk page request and see also User talk:RickinBaltimore, giving the discussion one more time
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hhkohh (talk) 15:04, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what more comments could be made here. Only four people have commented here (3 deletes including myself and 1 keep). If this isn't enough for a consensus, I don't think we will be getting more. It doesn't seem like these templates have much interest. 2601:2C4:C480:946:A0B5:2353:8652:D6E5 (talk) 02:51, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- IP, two delete votes are from IP. ~~We mainly look at registered votes~~, sorry Hhkohh (talk) 03:23, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: IPs are not second-class citizens and have every right to !vote in these proceedings, but since there have been no additional comments since the last relist (which was apparently controversial) I will relist a second time.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 03:09, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the listed template. I think Template:Elendil family tree is probably on the wrong side of WP:NOTPLOT/WP:WAF--these family trees are not about real people, but that was not nominated for deletion, so I won't speak too much on it. --Izno (talk) 18:09, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Michéal Castaldo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:39, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Michéal Castaldo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The singer's navigational template consists of 11 links: the artist's article, six album links that redirect back to the artist's article and four "related" topics that do not contain the template. So the navigational template is used in one article and it does not navigate anywhere. Aspects (talk) 01:55, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NENAN. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:28, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no useful navigation is coming out of this navbox. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 20:07, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).