Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 September 14
September 14
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was keep. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:20, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Navbox with just three links. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 23:11, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- keep, connects 6 articles, and more articles are being written. Frietjes (talk) 13:41, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:20, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
- Template:Fy/doc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
This documentation page is no longer used. thayts💬 19:25, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- speedy delete per CSD:G8. Frietjes (talk) 13:40, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 13:21, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Unclear purpose - if something is verified per our policy, it's cited. – Train2104 (t • c) 11:25, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. As per nom, cannot be verified without a citation. Lithopsian (talk) 12:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- delete, per above. makes no sense. Frietjes (talk)
- Delete, I am agree with everyone. I think Joey P. - THE OFFICIAL is also making disruptive editings. We need to talk with him in his talk page. ZaperaWiki44 (talk) 08:00, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
- delete as contradictory. I can't think of a place we'd actually use this anywhere. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:21, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).