Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 June 10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 10

[edit]

Cricket shortcuts

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. There's a consensus to delete. Also per discussion at relevant wiki projects. (non-admin closure) Yashovardhan (talk) 08:59, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Hello, The-Pope. I removed them following a valid concern raised by an editor at CRIC and because investigation showed that many of them had been used negligently, creating grammatical/syntax errors such as "a ODI" or "Test cricket cricket matches". Although it is not really relevent, the templates were created and mostly used by an editor who has been blocked, which perhaps doesn't give them much credibility (though they do have much greater credibility than that stupid woman who is squatting in Downing Street); as I say, though, that isn't a reason for AfD. Jack | talk page 14:20, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • If you use them with subst: then nothing is obscured, and links are standardised, not a random collection of capitalisation and hyphenations via redirects. For example, 5 variations of capitalisation and hyphenations redirect to First-class cricket. This ensures that the correct one is used. But they aren't compulsory, if you don't like them, don't use them! Easy! If the sentence is grammatically incorrect, fix it! The-Pope (talk) 16:44, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:01, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template has content just like Template:Villages in Manopad Mandal, which was recently listed for Deletion IM3847 (talk) 07:11, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:01, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This template which has villages from a particular mandal may not meet Wikipedian standards IM3847 (talk) 07:09, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:01, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template only links to two article. One on the ballpark. Other links are to a template and a category. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:20, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yashovardhan (talk) 06:39, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:59, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox for individual episodes of a television sitcom, of which ten have already been deleted as not having standalone notability as separate topics from the series as a whole, and five more are currently up for AFD for the same reason -- of the sixteen episodes listed here, there's just one that has actually has a credible claim to a standalone article. But a navbox isn't necessary just to link one topic to itself. Bearcat (talk) 14:11, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yashovardhan (talk) 06:14, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:59, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, 2 of 4 links are redirects Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:28, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:59, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, unclear inclusion Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:25, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:59, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, there are much better block templates now. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:24, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:59, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and incomplete Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 02:55, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:59, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar, project was renamed. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 02:27, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 17. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:57, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 17. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:57, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 17. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:57, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Campaignbox Julian's Persian War. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:56, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused sidebar Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 01:33, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 17. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:56, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 June 17. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:56, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:56, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, doesn't navigate anything Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 00:57, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep as the main rationale for deletion was "unused" and now it is used. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:55, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, doesn't navigate anything. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 00:56, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Solved. Now the pages covering Ion Iliescu have incorporated this template. – Alexandru M. (talk · contribs), 10 June 2017, 16:42 (EEST)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:55, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, overly loosely defined. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 00:55, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was redirect to Template:Shared IP. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:54, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused from 2008, doesn't seem to have a purpose Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 00:50, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 03:05, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, would fail WP:NENAN if used. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 00:46, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).