Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 August 8

< August 7	August 9 >

August 8

Template:Euro coin copyright tag

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 10:15, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Euro coin copyright tag (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, redundant (as an overly specific version) to {{Non-free currency}} FASTILY 00:30, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 00:13, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: It's only unused because you recently replaced its uses on the relevant file description pages. Among other things, the template notes that photographic reproductions of Euro coins are specifically allowed (but unfaithful derivatives are not). Some editors have taken this to mean that NFCC restrictions on resolution, etc. need not necessarily apply to them. --Paul_012 (talk) 00:22, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 16:54, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Callimachus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 August 25. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 10:14, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Callimachus (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Minhaj-ul-Quran International

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 10:14, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Minhaj-ul-Quran International (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not needed. Totally used for promotional purposes. Greenbörg (talk) 16:55, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to a WP:NAVBOX, which could accommodate the links displayed on this template. Mar4d (talk) 16:27, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades^Godric 16:52, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- excessive and promotional. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:06, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because the template lists all the organizations and sub-organizations accurately. There is nothing promotional because the listed sub-organizations are notable. Mohd Sarim Ashrafi (talk) 06:54, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Redundant Doctor Who Episode head/body

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 August 25. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades of Godric^{On leave} 10:13, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Doctor Who episode head (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Doctor Who episode head (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Doctor Who episode body (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Doctor Who episode body (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Jism series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:12, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jism series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only two links. Not enough for a navbox. --wooden superman 15:31, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only 2 links because you deleted all the others. Your preventing navigation between articles in a disruptive manner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.249.226.130 (talk) 00:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All the other links were cast and crew, which fails WP:PERFNAV. ----wooden superman 07:53, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So linking those involved who have won awards for the film is not allowed? Another Wiki rule that is not logical. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.249.225.165 (talk) 11:16, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's perfectly logical, if you care to read the guideline. --wooden superman 11:46, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete' -- insufficient navigation. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:04, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Development hubs in West Bengal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:55, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Development hubs in West Bengal (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and functionally blanked Frietjes (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Delete. It is obsolete and totally out of date. - Chandan Guha (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Editnotices/Page/No worries

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 03:02, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Editnotices/Page/No worries (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template provides a warning to anyone who might edit No worries which is redundant to general Wikipedia policies (no original research, verifiability, etc.). The edit notice was apparently instituted seven years ago to deal with a brief period of inappropriate edits by IP users. However, the problem has receded. This article has received only 36 edits in the last two years, so it isn't experiencing any kind of edit war. I contacted the editor who created this template, but they haven't been active on Wikipedia for over a year, so they have not commented on whether or not this template continues to be needed. I tend to think not. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:01, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The page hasn't ever been protected, so I imagine the issues can't be that bad. TheDragonFire (talk) 13:07, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the Fallschirmjäger

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2017 August 23. Primefac (talk) 00:15, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Knight's Cross recipients of the Fallschirmjäger (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).