Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 May 8

< May 7	May 9 >

May 8

Template:2016 Summer Olympics Participating National Olympic Committees – Flag-bearers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ Rob^Talk 06:45, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2016 Summer Olympics Participating National Olympic Committees – Flag-bearers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Was created via an article for creation request but isn't transcluded anywhere and I can see no reason why it would be. We already have a list at 2016 Summer Olympics Parade of Nations and I do't imagine this template will get used on each flag bearer's article - Basement12 (T.C) 23:29, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this template is unnecessary as the list is only used on one article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 14:03, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 23:00, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lmage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:46, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Lmage (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

possibly an attempt to quietly insert vandalism into articles given the history of the article where it was inserted. Frietjes (talk) 22:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Dole Hawaii family tree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) ~ Rob^Talk 06:48, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dole Hawaii family tree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unreferenced since 2015. No evidence it is accurate. Magioladitis (talk) 20:25, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Kilian family tree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ Rob^Talk 06:46, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kilian family tree (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unreferenced since 2015. No evidence it is accurate. Magioladitis (talk) 20:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK I just ran through this family on Wikidata and as these are autogenerated in reasonator, these can go now. Probably too unwieldy to have around in Wikimarkup anyway. Jane (talk) 08:28, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Family tree of House Tully

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Keep. Withdrawn. Magioladitis (talk) 22:16, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Family tree of House Tully (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unreferenced since 2015. No evidence this family tree is accurate. Magioladitis (talk) 20:17, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - I have just fully cited this navigation template back to the source novel(s). Can we close this? — TAnthony^Talk 21:36, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Location map Central Serbia relief

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete as unopposed. WP:REFUND applies. (non-admin closure) ~ Rob^Talk 19:58, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Location map Central Serbia relief (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Location map Cuba relief (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Location map Iberia relief (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Location map Slovakia relief (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Location map Switzerland relief (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and not needed since relief maps are just the secondary map in a standard location map. Frietjes (talk) 19:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Global Force Wrestling personnel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) ~ Rob^Talk 19:48, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Global Force Wrestling personnel (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The main article was deleted afer an AfD discussion. Same reasons, the template is useless since we don't know who wrestlers are working of the promotion. I ask for deletion. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 12:47, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for same reason that I supported the AfD. We don't know if GFW has a roster, and if they do we aren't entirely sure what that roster consists of, making the navbox useless.LM2000 (talk) 23:10, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and article deletion discussion. No regular roster, so the template is useless. It'd be a barely notable Indy if the founder was anyone else (and notability is not inherited). oknazevad (talk) 00:15, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Secondary schools in Hungary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted here. (non-admin closure) ~ Rob^Talk 19:47, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Secondary schools in Hungary (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template needs to be divided into multiple such templates by region. Listing all senior high schools in Hungary in a single template would be too much.

IMO the end result should be one template per Hungarian county (with Budapest having its own such template) or one per Hungarian region.

WhisperToMe (talk) 03:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I hope this is the right place for discussion. As I commented on WhisperToMe talk page, I do not have strong opinion on it. In ideal situation (where there are articles about all major schools in Hungary) it would be the only rational option. However, once I was making this Template I noticed that there is not to much articles on this topic so I decided to put them all together, and to include only schools that have articles on English Wikipedia. With more templates we will have much more red links. Of course, it will give the reader information on all high school, but I avoided it back than from aesthetic point of view. My only proposal is that if you decide to make change, instead of deleting current template, you move it to Template:High Schools in Budapest and adapt it for this narrower use.--MirkoS18 (talk) 13:50, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: That would be a great idea. Moving this template to Budapest, and then detaching the schools not in Budapest and giving them their own templates. WhisperToMe (talk) 04:25, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).