Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 June 30
June 30
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:06, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
- Template:CoINlinks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Per Template talk:Ln/Archive 2#Edit request on 3 March 2014 (to {{la}}), this template looks like some sort of resolution Technical 13 (a currently sitbanned editor) to resolve some sort of issue or necessary change to Template:La. At this point though, it seems as though this template ended up never being used. So, probably delete or userfy (in the event Technical 13 gets unbanned and they wish to pick it back up) on this one. Steel1943 (talk) 20:54, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Technical 13 was trying to rewrite the whole
{{la}}group of templates, the object was apparently simplification - but they ended up more complicated, with adverse effects for the post‐expand include size, expansion depth, etc., so that pages like WP:TFD were showing bluelinks where transclusions should have been - in short, the WP:TLIMITs were being hit sooner. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:10, 30 June 2016 (UTC) - Delete the experiment. Maybe Lua would be better for something like this, though I'm not sure that would really be an improvement, either. —PC-XT+ 00:21, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:06, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable single game award that has only existed for a few years. Fails WP:NAVBOX criterion #4. Jenks24 (talk) 04:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable enough to warrant it's own page therefore fails to meet WP:NAVBOX #4. Flickerd (talk) 10:37, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:08, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable single game award that only existed for a few years. Fails WP:NAVBOX criterion #4. Jenks24 (talk) 04:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable enough to warrant it's own page therefore fails to meet WP:NAVBOX #4. Flickerd (talk) 10:38, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:09, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
Non-notable single game award that only existed for a few years. Fails WP:NAVBOX criterion #4. Jenks24 (talk) 04:14, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, not notable enough to warrant it's own page therefore fails to meet WP:NAVBOX #4. Flickerd (talk) 10:38, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).