Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 July 2

< July 1	July 3 >

July 2

Template:New York City Audio Productions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:18, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:New York City Audio Productions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Doesn't meet most of WP:NAVBOX's five points—not connected to each other in any way apart from apparently being four post-production companies in NYC. czar 22:09, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom for (;;) (talk) 07:01, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Multicol

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge the various "multi" templates below into the "Col-begin" system. While discussion didn't focus on which direction to merge, I've examined the templates, and it's technically easier to merge in this direction to the point where AnomieBOT will be able to mass-substitute them after converting to a wrapper of sorts. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 04:26, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Multicol (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Col-begin (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Multicol with Template:Col-begin.
They obviously do the same thing and their auxiliary templates too. Dvorapa (talk) 14:23, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

support, assuming we also merge all the sibling templates (e.g., col-break, col-end, ...) Frietjes (talk) 22:33, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: @Frietjes: Could you nominate the other templates you want included in this nomination clearly with notices on their template pages?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob^Talk 18:42, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Multicol-break (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Col-break (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Multicol-end (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Col-end (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Merge sounds ok; though I haven't looked these over as much as I would have liked, I expect this can be accomplished. —PC-XT+ 17:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Turkish musicians

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. The single opposing editor failed to argue against the fact that this either has an arbitrary selection criteria or would become far too large to be a useful navbox. There is also a good deal of precedent that categories are preferable in these sorts of situations. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:07, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Turkish musicians (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

this is why we have list articles (List of Turkish musicians) and categories (Category:Turkish musicians). Frietjes (talk) 14:38, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This template is used to list links to related pages. Neither a list article nor a cat serves this purpose. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 16:08, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- how do you decide which of the entries in Category:Turkish musicians (and subcategories like Category:Musicians from Ankara) go in the template? Frietjes (talk) 13:18, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- see discussion for Macedonian musicians for precedent (notifying Underlying lk, DavidLeighEllis, Banhtrung1 who participated in that discussion). Frietjes (talk) 13:08, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per precedent, as this seems too large of a selection criteria. It could be split, perhaps, but it sounds like there are other preferable ways of navigating between musicians. —PC-XT+ 17:53, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Brazil national team youth squad templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete all. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Brazil squad 1974 South American U-20 Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 1977 FIFA World Youth Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 1981 FIFA World Youth Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 1983 FIFA World Youth Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 1983 South American U-20 Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 1985 FIFA World Youth Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 1985 South American U-20 Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 1987 FIFA World Youth Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 1988 South American U-20 Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 1989 FIFA World Youth Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 1991 FIFA World Youth Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 1991 South American U-20 Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 1993 FIFA World Youth Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 1995 FIFA World Youth Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 1997 FIFA World Youth Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 1999 FIFA World Youth Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 2001 FIFA World Youth Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 2003 FIFA World Youth Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 2005 FIFA World Youth Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 2007 FIFA U-20 World Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 2009 FIFA U-20 World Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 2011 FIFA U-20 World Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Brazil squad 2015 FIFA U-20 World Cup (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

There is longstanding consensus at both TFD and WT:FOOTBALL that youth squad templates are not notable - only senior ones, and only for major tournaments. These have all been created by one over-zealous user and should all be deleted. Giant Snowman 13:11, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 13:11, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete per prior consensus. Frietjes (talk) 14:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete speedy per numerous prior consensus. JackHoang (talk) 00:36, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Kante4 (talk) 10:39, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all per standing consensus. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 08:58, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss Namibia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:51, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Miss Namibia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox with just one link. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, we can use standard linking for connecting two articles. Frietjes (talk) 14:40, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:From Ashes to New

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:50, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:From Ashes to New (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The articles which are linked to in this template all link to an from each other thus this navbox doesn't further aid in navigation. WP:NENAN. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 06:53, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, we can use standard linking for connecting three articles. Frietjes (talk) 14:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Red Sun Rising

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Red Sun Rising (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Musical group with an article for only one album. Links only between two articles don't need a navigation box. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 06:44, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, we can use standard linking for connecting two articles. Frietjes (talk) 14:40, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete, no need for a navigation box with only two articles. Acidskater (talk) 13:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Miss Bolivia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 03:47, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Miss Bolivia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox with just one link. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:20, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete, we can use standard linking for connecting two articles. Frietjes (talk) 14:40, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).