Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 July 15
July 15
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. No argument for deletion and wrong venue. Userboxes are discussed at WP:MfD. ~ Rob13Talk 17:01, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
VarunFEB2003 (talk) 13:00, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as you have made no argument at all for deletion. Pppery (talk) 15:06, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- wrong venue. per the instructions at the top of WP:TFD, user boxes are discussed at WP:MFD. Frietjes (talk) 16:58, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. No argument for deletion and wrong venue. Userboxes are discussed at WP:MfD. ~ Rob13Talk 17:01, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Template:User Grade Ten (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
VarunFEB2003 (talk) 12:59, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as you have made no argument at all for deletion. Pppery (talk) 15:06, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- wrong venue. per the instructions at the top of WP:TFD, user boxes are discussed at WP:MFD. Frietjes (talk) 16:58, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was speedy keep. No argument for deletion and wrong venue. Userboxes are discussed at WP:MfD. ~ Rob13Talk 17:01, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Template:User likes Dog (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
VarunFEB2003 (talk) 12:58, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Keep as you have made no argument at all for deletion. Pppery (talk) 15:06, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- wrong venue. per the instructions at the top of WP:TFD, user boxes are discussed at WP:MFD. Frietjes (talk) 16:58, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 August 4. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:47, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Omni Flames (talk) 08:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:53, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (or userfy) as premature until all the articles are made —PC-XT+ 20:17, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 August 4. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:48, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Omni Flames (talk) 12:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:53, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:11, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (or userfy) as premature until all 4 articles are established —PC-XT+ 22:42, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Omni Flames (talk) 07:20, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:53, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (or userfy) for now as premature until most of the articles are established —PC-XT+ 22:46, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 21:43, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:53, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (or userfy) for now as premature until more of the articles are established —PC-XT+ 22:57, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 21:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:53, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (or userfy) as premature until all 4 articles are established —PC-XT+ 02:32, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 21:53, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:52, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, as there have only been three coaches, and only one has an article, so it is very premature —PC-XT+ 02:56, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 21:57, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:52, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (or userfy) for now as premature until most of the articles have been established —PC-XT+ 03:01, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 22:04, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:52, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (or userfy) as premature until the articles are established —PC-XT+ 03:34, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 22:06, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:52, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (or userfy) for now as premature until all the articles are established —PC-XT+ 06:07, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 22:09, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:51, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (or userfy) as premature until most of the coaches have articles —PC-XT+ 07:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 22:12, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:51, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (or userfy) as premature until the articles are established —PC-XT+ 17:43, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 22:16, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:51, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (or userfy) for now as premature until there are enough articles —PC-XT+ 17:59, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 22:18, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:51, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (or userfy) for now as premature until more articles are established —PC-XT+ 18:34, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 22:23, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:51, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (or userfy) as premature until a couple more articles are established —PC-XT+ 18:43, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 22:28, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:50, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant to wikilinks with only two coaches (one a red link) —PC-XT+ 18:53, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 22:31, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:50, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (or userfy) for now as premature until the other articles are established —PC-XT+ 18:56, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 22:46, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:50, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant to links with only two coaches, one red —PC-XT+ 19:11, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 22:48, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:50, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant to wikilinks with only two coaches —PC-XT+ 19:25, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 22:51, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:49, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 02:12, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:49, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (or userfy) as premature until more articles are established —PC-XT+ 21:10, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 02:14, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:49, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (or userfy) as premature until more articles are established —PC-XT+ 21:15, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 02:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:49, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (or userfy) as premature until a couple more articles are established —PC-XT+ 21:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 02:17, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:49, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (or userfy) as premature until more articles are established —PC-XT+ 21:17, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 02:20, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:49, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (or userfy) as premature until a couple more articles are established —PC-XT+ 21:18, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 02:22, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:48, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (or userfy) as premature until the other articles are established —PC-XT+ 21:19, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 02:25, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:48, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete (or userfy) as premature until a couple more articles are established —PC-XT+ 21:20, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- delete, does not connect a sufficient number of articles. Frietjes (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 August 4. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:49, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 August 2#Template:Clone_Wars (non-admin closure) Omni Flames (talk) 08:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Clone Wars (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unnecessary template that lists the media that is set in or around one in-universe event of Star Wars, the Clone Wars. It fails WP:NAVBOX No. 1, as they are, collectively, not a "single, coherent subject". It is redundant because the content of this navbox is covered by several navboxes already. The main {{Star Wars}} navbox provides links to general articles, Category:Star Wars film navigational boxes has navboxes based upon Star Wars films, {{Star Wars games}} mentions video games, {{Star Wars comics}} comics, {{Star Wars Legends novels}} links to the "expanded universe" literature, while {{Star Wars canon novels}} mentions the "official canon" ones. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:05, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Relisting comment: I've notified WP:WikiProject Star Wars to receive their input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob13Talk 03:23, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisted at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 August 2#Template:ARSS (non-admin closure) Omni Flames (talk) 08:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Template:ARSS (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:ARSS/1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
This template that seems rather unnecessary for a few reasons. For one, it's only purpose seems to be to link to pages within Wikipedia with built-in paragraph formatting; this is redundant to manually linking pages within Wikipedia with paragraph formatting. And secondly, per the way Template:ARSS/1 is currently built, those internal pages within Wikipedia are set up as external links instead of internal links. (Even if this were to be fixed, this template still seems unnecessary. Also, the template's instructions since 2009 were to substitute the template ... which creates over a hundred lines of unnecessary code.) Steel1943 (talk) 21:31, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Rob13Talk 03:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was Relisted on 2016 August 1 (non-admin closure) Omni Flames (talk) 21:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Omni Flames (talk) 21:55, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Not enough links to provide useful navigation. ~ Rob13Talk 03:01, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as redundant to links with only one coach —PC-XT+ 21:23, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was relisted on 2016 August 4. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:50, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was no consensus. This appears to be an attempt at forum shopping after the RM was unsuccessful, and I encourage the nominator to either provide a more compelling rationale for merging/renaming/changing this template or drop the stick. ~ Rob13Talk 01:07, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
- Template:Human sexuality (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
To be merged with {{Sex}}. ~ Sharif uddin (talk) 10:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Pinging Flyer22 Reborn, Johnuniq, NeilN, Zad68, Grayfell, Cullen328 and Nigelj and for their input. Sharif uddin (talk) 10:16, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- This appears to be an attempt to rewrite history. A hard-to-follow rename request at Template talk:Sex/Archive 1#Rename was closed as "no consensus" by Jenks24 on 5 July 2016. There is no clear rationale for a change, and indeed it's not clear what the proposal is. However, only Sharif uddin supports a change. Johnuniq (talk) 10:23, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- Pro forma Oppose as no reason for the merge has been given. --NeilN talk to me 13:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).