Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2016 January 11
Appearance
January 11
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 03:06, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
- Template:FlagiconUCI (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
I created this back in 2007 when I didn't understand WP:MOSFLAG as well, which it clearly fails. Severo (talk) 22:22, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per WP:G7. The nominator, User:Severo, is template creator, and has requested deletion via this TfD. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 11:29, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Dirtlawyer1, G7 does not apply, as Severo is not the only substantive contributor to the template. Relentlessly (talk) 09:41, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Hmmm. What substantive contributions would that be? Here's the net contributions all of the various contributors have made to the template since Severo created the template: [1]. To my untrained eye, the net additions appear to be not much more than the TfD notice template. Your mileage may vary. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 09:46, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- Dirtlawyer1, G7 does not apply, as Severo is not the only substantive contributor to the template. Relentlessly (talk) 09:41, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- It is basically {{db-author}}, but I'll support deletion either way, per nom. —PC-XT+ 00:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Primefac (talk) 03:22, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Nothing to navigate The Banner talk 19:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Not enough links....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:34, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).